From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: sd: implement proper support for sd3.0 au sizes
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:14:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52942E4B.9010501@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385428585-17516-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
Hi Wolfram,
Good catch. It's right. Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 11/26/2013 10:16 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This reverts and updates commit 77776fd0a4cc541b9a528eacc1d31ca47eb1ae7a
> ("mmc: sd: fix the maximum au_size for SD3.0"). The au_size for SD3.0
> cannot be achieved by a simple bit shift, so this needs to be
> implemented differently. Also, don't print the warning in case of 0
> since 'not defined' is different from 'invalid'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
>
> ---
>
> Only tested with non SD3.0 cards (au = 0 and au = 9). Testers for 3.0 cards
> much appreciated.
>
> drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> index 6f42050..3b5ac4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ static const unsigned int tacc_mant[] = {
> 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 70, 80,
> };
>
> +static const unsigned int sd_au_size[] = {
> + 0, SZ_16K / 512, SZ_32K / 512, SZ_64K / 512,
> + SZ_128K / 512, SZ_256K / 512, SZ_512K / 512, SZ_1M / 512,
> + SZ_2M / 512, SZ_4M / 512, SZ_8M / 512, (SZ_8M + SZ_4M) / 512,
> + SZ_16M / 512, (SZ_16M + SZ_8M) / 512, SZ_32M / 512, SZ_64M / 512,
> +};
> +
> #define UNSTUFF_BITS(resp,start,size) \
> ({ \
> const int __size = size; \
> @@ -216,7 +223,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_scr(struct mmc_card *card)
> static int mmc_read_ssr(struct mmc_card *card)
> {
> unsigned int au, es, et, eo;
> - int err, i, max_au;
> + int err, i;
> u32 *ssr;
>
> if (!(card->csd.cmdclass & CCC_APP_SPEC)) {
> @@ -240,26 +247,25 @@ static int mmc_read_ssr(struct mmc_card *card)
> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> ssr[i] = be32_to_cpu(ssr[i]);
>
> - /* SD3.0 increases max AU size to 64MB (0xF) from 4MB (0x9) */
> - max_au = card->scr.sda_spec3 ? 0xF : 0x9;
> -
> /*
> * UNSTUFF_BITS only works with four u32s so we have to offset the
> * bitfield positions accordingly.
> */
> au = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 428 - 384, 4);
> - if (au > 0 && au <= max_au) {
> - card->ssr.au = 1 << (au + 4);
> - es = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 408 - 384, 16);
> - et = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 402 - 384, 6);
> - eo = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 400 - 384, 2);
> - if (es && et) {
> - card->ssr.erase_timeout = (et * 1000) / es;
> - card->ssr.erase_offset = eo * 1000;
> + if (au) {
> + if (au <= 9 || card->scr.sda_spec3) {
> + card->ssr.au = sd_au_size[au];
> + es = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 408 - 384, 16);
> + et = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 402 - 384, 6);
> + if (es && et) {
> + eo = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 400 - 384, 2);
> + card->ssr.erase_timeout = (et * 1000) / es;
> + card->ssr.erase_offset = eo * 1000;
> + }
> + } else {
> + pr_warning("%s: SD Status: Invalid Allocation Unit size.\n",
> + mmc_hostname(card->host));
> }
> - } else {
> - pr_warning("%s: SD Status: Invalid Allocation Unit "
> - "size.\n", mmc_hostname(card->host));
> }
> out:
> kfree(ssr);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-26 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-26 1:16 [PATCH] mmc: core: sd: implement proper support for sd3.0 au sizes Wolfram Sang
2013-11-26 5:14 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2013-11-26 17:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-11-26 16:26 ` Hartley Sweeten
2013-12-18 12:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-13 12:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-13 18:04 ` Chris Ball
2014-01-13 18:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-13 19:14 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52942E4B.9010501@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox