From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:16:25 +0800 Message-ID: <5301D369.5010100@realtek.com> References: <1392199238-14500-1-git-send-email-rogerable@realtek.com> <1392199238-14500-2-git-send-email-rogerable@realtek.com> <20140214094427.GA7380@lee--X1> <5301A786.8040607@realtek.com> <20140217082222.GA17875@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140217082222.GA17875@lee--X1> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Ulf Hansson , Maxim Levitsky , Alex Dubov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wei_wang@realsil.com.cn, Dan Carpenter , Samuel Ortiz List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 02/17/2014 04:22 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> From: Roger Tseng >>>> >>>> Realtek USB card reader provides a channel to transfer command or data to flash >>>> memory cards. This driver exports host instances for mmc and memstick subsystems >>>> and handles basic works. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Tseng >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 + >>>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + >>>> drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c | 760 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h | 628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 4 files changed, 1399 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c >>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h >>> >>> Applied again, thanks. >>> >> Would you also apply patch 2/3 and 3/3 that to make the device fully >> operational for users? Or should they be applied by maintainers of >> mmc/memstick subsystems? >> >> Chris, would you give some comment? > > I can apply them, but I need the other Maintainer Acks. > > If they are build orthogonal i.e. there are no build dependencies > between them, it's probably better that they go into their associated > trees separately. > I think it would be better to apply them together since the later patches really depend on the 1st one,so now we are waiting for Acks from mmc/memstick subsystems. But there is no one specified for "memstick/host/" in MAINTAINERS. Could anyone else Ack this?