linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
Subject: Re: mmc: core: retries counter for data command initialization.
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:48:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535F9173.1030102@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535F5B02.9060908@codeaurora.org>

On 04/29/14 10:55, Konstantin Dorfman wrote:

Correction inside

> Hi All,
>
> After 6035d9730d5825e6e3c225b721a5847a521d6556 "mmc: fix async request
> mechanism for sequential read scenarios" mmc layer data path async
> request handling was separated from mmc commands path.
>
> mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() function is used to wait for completion of
> the currently running data request, while for commands
> mmc_wait_for_req_done() is used.
>
> There is code that repeats request cmd->retries times in case of error.
> The problem that for data command this counter is not initialized
> properly as it does for mmc command sending:
>
>
> int mmc_wait_for_cmd(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, int
> retries)
> {
>      struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
>
>      WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
>
>      memset(cmd->resp, 0, sizeof(cmd->resp));
>      cmd->retries = retries;                 <-- supplied by
>                                                      caller
>
>      mrq.cmd = cmd;
>      cmd->data = NULL;
>
>      mmc_wait_for_req(host, &mrq);
>
>      return cmd->error;
> }
>
> I found that there is no similar initialization for data command
> processing code, so the counter cmd->retries remains always 0.
>
> Lets discuss:
> - do we need retries for data request
> - what value is good: for command there are 0 or 5 retries
> - where to do this initialization:

card/block.c: static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
			       struct mmc_card *card,
			       int disable_multi,
			       struct mmc_queue *mq)

>
> Thanks,
> Kostya
>


-- 
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29  7:55 mmc: core: retries counter for data command initialization Konstantin Dorfman
2014-04-29 11:48 ` Konstantin Dorfman [this message]
2014-05-12 14:33   ` Fwd: " Konstantin Dorfman
2014-05-13  8:19     ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535F9173.1030102@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kdorfman@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).