linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* mmc: freeing host while host->detect work queue is still active
@ 2014-09-11 22:03 Stephen Warren
  2014-09-12 16:08 ` Stephen Warren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-09-11 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Ball, Ulf Hansson
  Cc: Russell King, Adrian Hunter, Alexandre Courbot,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Running Fedora rawhides's 3.17.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc22.armv7hl kernel on 
Jetson TK1 (an ARM board containing Tegra SoC), I see the following 
during boot most times the Tegra SDHCI driver defers probe for the SD slot:

> [    8.377719] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: Got CD GPIO #170.
> [    8.377780] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: Got WP GPIO #132.
> [    8.377898] mmc1: Unknown controller version (3). You may experience problems.
> [    8.379796] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: No vmmc regulator found
> [    8.380225] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    8.380243] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6 at lib/debugobjects.c:263 debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb4()
> [    8.380261] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x18
> [    8.380308] Modules linked in: ehci_tegra(+) sdhci_tegra sdhci_pltfm sdhci phy_tegra_usb mmc_core i2c_tegra tegra_drm drm_kms_helper drm host1x
> [    8.380319] CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 3.17.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc22.armv7hl #1
> [    8.380336] Workqueue: deferwq deferred_probe_work_func
> [    8.380358] [<c0218ffc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0212bf0>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
> [    8.380374] [<c0212bf0>] (show_stack) from [<c094dbe0>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xb0)
> [    8.380395] [<c094dbe0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0251690>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0x94)
> [    8.380413] [<c0251690>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c02516e8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x34/0x44)
> [    8.380426] [<c02516e8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c057ec6c>] (debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb4)
> [    8.380439] [<c057ec6c>] (debug_print_object) from [<c057f8d8>] (debug_check_no_obj_freed+0xf4/0x1dc)
> [    8.380453] [<c057f8d8>] (debug_check_no_obj_freed) from [<c0398174>] (kfree+0x160/0x308)
> [    8.380465] [<c0398174>] (kfree) from [<c0658094>] (device_release+0x64/0x98)
> [    8.380479] [<c0658094>] (device_release) from [<c056a8a4>] (kobject_release+0x12c/0x19c)
> [    8.380498] [<c056a8a4>] (kobject_release) from [<bf2994b0>] (sdhci_tegra_probe+0x190/0x1bc [sdhci_tegra])
> [    8.380810] [<bf2994b0>] (sdhci_tegra_probe [sdhci_tegra]) from [<c065e024>] (platform_drv_probe+0x34/0x68)
> [    8.380825] [<c065e024>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c065c0bc>] (driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x33c)
> [    8.380838] [<c065c0bc>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c065a5f8>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0x9c)
> [    8.380852] [<c065a5f8>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c065bf08>] (device_attach+0x70/0x94)
> [    8.380865] [<c065bf08>] (device_attach) from [<c065b464>] (bus_probe_device+0x30/0xa4)
> [    8.380878] [<c065b464>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c065b954>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x88/0xb8)
> [    8.380894] [<c065b954>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c026b0e8>] (process_one_work+0x2a0/0x5f8)
> [    8.380908] [<c026b0e8>] (process_one_work) from [<c026c7e4>] (worker_thread+0x2d0/0x40c)
> [    8.380922] [<c026c7e4>] (worker_thread) from [<c027153c>] (kthread+0xd4/0xe8)
> [    8.380936] [<c027153c>] (kthread) from [<c020ecc8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
> [    8.380941] ---[ end trace b1f4b0fe632eb3a4 ]---

The problem is as follows:

The following sequence of calls requests the CD (Change Detect) IRQ for 
the SD slot:

sdhci_tegra_probe()
sdhci_tegra_parse_dt()
mmc_of_parse()
mmc_gpio_request_cd()
devm_request_threaded_irq()

The IRQ is triggered by a pin on the SD slot, so could be in any state, 
and might fire immediately. This causes the IRQ handler 
mmc_gpio_cd_irqt() to run, which calls mmc_detect_change() which calls 
mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, ...); Thus, the work queue can 
be immediately active.

However, if later part of sdhci_tegra_probe() fails, e.g. 
sdhci_add_host() -> mmc_regulator_get_supply() -> 
devm_regulator_get_optional() -> -EPROBE_DEFER, then sdhci_tegra_probe() 
needs to tear everything down, and so calls sdhci_pltfm_free() -> 
sdhci_free_host() -> mmc_free_host() -> put_device(&host->class_dev) -> 
mmc_host_classdev_release() -> kfree(host). However, host->detect is 
part of host and may still be active at this point, which is what 
triggers the ODETECT log spew mentioned above.

This doesn't happen in linux-next, because mmc_gpiod_request_cd() 
doesn't set up the IRQ handler. Rather this happens inside 
mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq() which is called from mmc_start_host(), which 
I believe is well after deferred probe could occur.

Some possible options for fixing this in 3.17 are:

a) Back-port whatever changes in mainline stopped mmc_of_parse()() from 
requesting the IRQ. That is commit 740a221ef0e5 "mmc: slot-gpio: Add 
GPIO descriptor based CD GPIO API". I haven't investigated how many 
other commits would be required for that commit to apply, but I'm 
nervous it'd be too many to apply to 3.17.

b) Fix the -EPROBE_DEFER cleanup path to explicitly free the IRQ (so it 
can't schedule the work queue any more), and then cancel the work queue 
(so it isn't active and doesn't trigger the ODETECT message).

A naive patch might be like:

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
index 31969436d77c..8125f916be4a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
@@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ void mmc_free_host(struct mmc_host *host)
  	idr_remove(&mmc_host_idr, host->index);
  	spin_unlock(&mmc_host_lock);

+	mmc_gpiod_free_cd(host);
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
+
  	put_device(&host->class_dev);
  }

However, that's problematic, since I think mmc_free_host() would have to 
somehow determine whether it needs to call mmc_gpio_free_cd() or 
mmc_gpiod_free_cd()? Perhaps we should *just* call devm_free_irq() 
there, rather than tearing down all the GPIO stuff too, i.e. split out a 
separate mmc_gpio_free_cd_irq() function rather like there's a separate 
IRQ request function?

What approach do people prefer and/or does anyone have any other ideas 
for a fix?

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: mmc: freeing host while host->detect work queue is still active
  2014-09-11 22:03 mmc: freeing host while host->detect work queue is still active Stephen Warren
@ 2014-09-12 16:08 ` Stephen Warren
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-09-12 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Ball, Ulf Hansson
  Cc: Russell King, Adrian Hunter, Alexandre Courbot,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij

On 09/11/2014 04:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Running Fedora rawhides's 3.17.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc22.armv7hl kernel on
> Jetson TK1 (an ARM board containing Tegra SoC), I see the following
> during boot most times the Tegra SDHCI driver defers probe for the SD slot:

(and indeed I can reproduce the same issue in plain old v3.17-rc4, so 
this isn't at all Fedora specific)

>> [    8.377719] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: Got CD GPIO #170.
>> [    8.377780] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: Got WP GPIO #132.
>> [    8.377898] mmc1: Unknown controller version (3). You may
>> experience problems.
>> [    8.379796] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: No vmmc regulator found
>> [    8.380225] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [    8.380243] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6 at lib/debugobjects.c:263
>> debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb4()
>> [    8.380261] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type:
>> timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x18
>> [    8.380308] Modules linked in: ehci_tegra(+) sdhci_tegra
>> sdhci_pltfm sdhci phy_tegra_usb mmc_core i2c_tegra tegra_drm
>> drm_kms_helper drm host1x
>> [    8.380319] CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted
>> 3.17.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc22.armv7hl #1
>> [    8.380336] Workqueue: deferwq deferred_probe_work_func
>> [    8.380358] [<c0218ffc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0212bf0>]
>> (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
>> [    8.380374] [<c0212bf0>] (show_stack) from [<c094dbe0>]
>> (dump_stack+0x84/0xb0)
>> [    8.380395] [<c094dbe0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0251690>]
>> (warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0x94)
>> [    8.380413] [<c0251690>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c02516e8>]
>> (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x34/0x44)
>> [    8.380426] [<c02516e8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c057ec6c>]
>> (debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb4)
>> [    8.380439] [<c057ec6c>] (debug_print_object) from [<c057f8d8>]
>> (debug_check_no_obj_freed+0xf4/0x1dc)
>> [    8.380453] [<c057f8d8>] (debug_check_no_obj_freed) from
>> [<c0398174>] (kfree+0x160/0x308)
>> [    8.380465] [<c0398174>] (kfree) from [<c0658094>]
>> (device_release+0x64/0x98)
>> [    8.380479] [<c0658094>] (device_release) from [<c056a8a4>]
>> (kobject_release+0x12c/0x19c)
>> [    8.380498] [<c056a8a4>] (kobject_release) from [<bf2994b0>]
>> (sdhci_tegra_probe+0x190/0x1bc [sdhci_tegra])
>> [    8.380810] [<bf2994b0>] (sdhci_tegra_probe [sdhci_tegra]) from
>> [<c065e024>] (platform_drv_probe+0x34/0x68)
>> [    8.380825] [<c065e024>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c065c0bc>]
>> (driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x33c)
>> [    8.380838] [<c065c0bc>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c065a5f8>]
>> (bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0x9c)
>> [    8.380852] [<c065a5f8>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c065bf08>]
>> (device_attach+0x70/0x94)
>> [    8.380865] [<c065bf08>] (device_attach) from [<c065b464>]
>> (bus_probe_device+0x30/0xa4)
>> [    8.380878] [<c065b464>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c065b954>]
>> (deferred_probe_work_func+0x88/0xb8)
>> [    8.380894] [<c065b954>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from
>> [<c026b0e8>] (process_one_work+0x2a0/0x5f8)
>> [    8.380908] [<c026b0e8>] (process_one_work) from [<c026c7e4>]
>> (worker_thread+0x2d0/0x40c)
>> [    8.380922] [<c026c7e4>] (worker_thread) from [<c027153c>]
>> (kthread+0xd4/0xe8)
>> [    8.380936] [<c027153c>] (kthread) from [<c020ecc8>]
>> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
>> [    8.380941] ---[ end trace b1f4b0fe632eb3a4 ]---
>
> The problem is as follows:
>
> The following sequence of calls requests the CD (Change Detect) IRQ for
> the SD slot:
>
> sdhci_tegra_probe()
> sdhci_tegra_parse_dt()
> mmc_of_parse()
> mmc_gpio_request_cd()
> devm_request_threaded_irq()
>
> The IRQ is triggered by a pin on the SD slot, so could be in any state,
> and might fire immediately. This causes the IRQ handler
> mmc_gpio_cd_irqt() to run, which calls mmc_detect_change() which calls
> mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, ...); Thus, the work queue can
> be immediately active.
>
> However, if later part of sdhci_tegra_probe() fails, e.g.
> sdhci_add_host() -> mmc_regulator_get_supply() ->
> devm_regulator_get_optional() -> -EPROBE_DEFER, then sdhci_tegra_probe()
> needs to tear everything down, and so calls sdhci_pltfm_free() ->
> sdhci_free_host() -> mmc_free_host() -> put_device(&host->class_dev) ->
> mmc_host_classdev_release() -> kfree(host). However, host->detect is
> part of host and may still be active at this point, which is what
> triggers the ODETECT log spew mentioned above.
>
> This doesn't happen in linux-next, because mmc_gpiod_request_cd()
> doesn't set up the IRQ handler. Rather this happens inside
> mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq() which is called from mmc_start_host(), which
> I believe is well after deferred probe could occur.
>
> Some possible options for fixing this in 3.17 are:
>
> a) Back-port whatever changes in mainline stopped mmc_of_parse()() from
> requesting the IRQ. That is commit 740a221ef0e5 "mmc: slot-gpio: Add
> GPIO descriptor based CD GPIO API". I haven't investigated how many
> other commits would be required for that commit to apply, but I'm
> nervous it'd be too many to apply to 3.17.

Sorry, I quoted the wrong commit ID there. That commit is already 
present in 3.17 (and some earlier). That commit adds the separate 
mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq() function that's necessary to solve the 
problem, and adds a call to it from mmc_start_host(). However, it still 
leaves a call to mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq() in mmc_gpio_request_cd(), 
thus leaving the problem in place.

The following commit from linux-next actually solves the problem for me, 
by having mmc_of_parse() call mmc_gpiod_request_cd() [which doesn't call 
mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq()] rather than mmc_gpio_request_cd():

98e90de99a0c mmc: host: switch OF parser to use gpio descriptors

That commit relies on at least one of the following two commits in order 
to successfully build directly on top of 3.17-rc4:

9d2fa2428ae1 mmc: slot-gpio: add gpiod variant to get wp GPIO
9fbc695075e9 mmc: slot-gpio: switch to use flags when getting GPIO

Is that too much to apply for 3.17 too?

However I note that this only solves the problem for any user of 
mmc_of_parse(); any code still calling mmc_gpio_request_cd() directly 
could still be exposed to the issue. I wonder if we shouldn't also 
remove the call to mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq() from mmc_gpio_request_cd().

So...

> b) Fix the -EPROBE_DEFER cleanup path to explicitly free the IRQ (so it
> can't schedule the work queue any more), and then cancel the work queue
> (so it isn't active and doesn't trigger the ODETECT message).
>
> A naive patch might be like:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> index 31969436d77c..8125f916be4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> @@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ void mmc_free_host(struct mmc_host *host)
>       idr_remove(&mmc_host_idr, host->index);
>       spin_unlock(&mmc_host_lock);
>
> +    mmc_gpiod_free_cd(host);
> +    cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
> +
>       put_device(&host->class_dev);
>   }

... something like that (but calling a new mmc_gpiod_free_cd_irq()) 
might still be the best approach. I guess I should just send a patch to 
do that?

> However, that's problematic, since I think mmc_free_host() would have to
> somehow determine whether it needs to call mmc_gpio_free_cd() or
> mmc_gpiod_free_cd()? Perhaps we should *just* call devm_free_irq()
> there, rather than tearing down all the GPIO stuff too, i.e. split out a
> separate mmc_gpio_free_cd_irq() function rather like there's a separate
> IRQ request function?
>
> What approach do people prefer and/or does anyone have any other ideas
> for a fix?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-12 16:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-11 22:03 mmc: freeing host while host->detect work queue is still active Stephen Warren
2014-09-12 16:08 ` Stephen Warren

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).