From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>,
Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:02:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B54187.7080008@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrs9SVt+8OSTHbkCFiY5ujdfXsqjg7E837CVZjEqz4EvA@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/13/15 16:41, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 16:11, Arend van Spriel<arend@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 01/13/15 15:56, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for looking at the patches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure I know what you mean. sdhci already has a re-tuning
>>>>>> timer, so
>>>>>> this is just moving it into core, where it won't be used by other
>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>> unless they enable it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am kind of questioning the re-tuning timer in sdhci. What is it good
>>>>> for?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is part of the SD Host Controller Standard Specification. The timer
>>>> ensures that re-tuning is done before temperature changes could affect
>>>> the
>>>> "sampling point". It is needed for re-tuning mode 1 for UHS-I modes like
>>>> SDR104.
>>>
>>>
>>> Does the spec say what value the timer should have?
>>
>>
>> It is read from the Capabilities register in the SD host controller, ie. in
>> field "Timer Count for Re-Tuning" (see below).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arend
>>
>> Timer Count for Re-Tuning
>> This field indicates an initial value of the Re-Tuning Timer for Re-Tuning
>> Mode 1 to 3. Setting to 0 disables Re-Tuning Timer.
>> 0h Re-Tuning Timer disabled
>> 1h 1 seconds
>> 2h 2 seconds
>> 3h 4 seconds
>> 4h 8 seconds
>> ..... ......................
>> n 2(n-1) seconds
>> ..... ......................
>> Bh 1024 seconds
>> Eh - Ch Reserved
>> Fh Get information from other source
>
> Thanks for sharing this information, but unfortunate I don't
> understand much from it.
>
> Is the host driver intended to read/poll this register to find a good value?
You can download the spec (and others) here [1]. sdhci currently
implements retuning mode 1, which is decribed in the spec:
Re-Tuning Timer Control Example for Re-Tuning Mode 1
The initial value of re-tuning timer is provided by Timer Count for
Re-Tuning field in this register. The timer starts counting by loading
the initial value. When the timer expires, the Host Driver marks an
expiration flag. On receiving a command request, the Host driver checks
the expiration flag. If the expiration flag is set, then the Host Driver
should perform the re-tuning procedure before issuing a command. If the
expiration flag is not set, then the Host Driver issues a command
without performing the re-tuning procedure. Every time the re-tuning
procedure is performed, the timer loads the new initial value and the
expiration flag is cleared.
So the host controller could indeed update this register for subsequent
retuning.
Regards,
Arend
[1] https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/pls/
> Isn't heat one of the most important factor that could effect the need
> for a re-tune? Does then the controller internally dynamically update
> this register (since it keep track of heat or similar)?
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 17:40 [RFC PATCH 00/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:40 ` [PATCH 01/13] mmc: core: Simplify by adding mmc_execute_tuning() Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 13:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 14:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 14:36 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 14:56 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 15:11 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-13 15:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 16:02 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2015-01-14 9:47 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-14 9:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-14 10:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-14 12:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-14 12:59 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-15 10:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-15 13:39 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-15 14:07 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-15 14:17 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-15 14:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-19 9:27 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-19 9:56 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-14 12:38 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-14 12:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 15:04 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] mmc: core: Disable re-tuning when card is no longer initialized Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] mmc: core: Move mmc_card_removed() into mmc_start_request() Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] mmc: core: Add support for re-tuning before each request Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] mmc: core: Check re-tuning before retrying Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during switch commands Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during erase commands Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning while bkops ongoing Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] mmc: mmc: Comment that callers need to hold re-tuning if the card is put to sleep Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] mmc: core: Add support for HS400 re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] mmc: sdhci: Always init buf_ready_int Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] mmc: sdhci: Change to new way of doing re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-19 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-19 14:37 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-12 13:05 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:27 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B54187.7080008@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@printf.net \
--cc=girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox