public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
	Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
	Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>,
	Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:24:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B66015.1010507@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFosO9D6sQagk1nPRZ5aTMDhYu2P7Y5jzFUdA8gAcTNJog@mail.gmail.com>

On 14/01/15 12:13, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 10:57, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 14/01/15 11:47, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 13 January 2015 at 17:02, Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>> On 01/13/15 16:41, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13 January 2015 at 16:11, Arend van Spriel<arend@broadcom.com>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/13/15 15:56, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for looking at the patches.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure I know what you mean. sdhci already has a re-tuning
>>>>>>>>>> timer, so
>>>>>>>>>> this is just moving it into core, where it won't be used by other
>>>>>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>>>>>> unless they enable it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am kind of questioning the re-tuning timer in sdhci. What is it good
>>>>>>>>> for?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is part of the SD Host Controller Standard Specification. The timer
>>>>>>>> ensures that re-tuning is done before temperature changes could affect
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> "sampling point". It is needed for re-tuning mode 1 for UHS-I modes
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> SDR104.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does the spec say what value the timer should have?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is read from the Capabilities register in the SD host controller, ie.
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> field "Timer Count for Re-Tuning" (see below).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Arend
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Timer Count for Re-Tuning
>>>>>> This field indicates an initial value of the Re-Tuning Timer for
>>>>>> Re-Tuning
>>>>>> Mode 1 to 3. Setting to 0 disables Re-Tuning Timer.
>>>>>> 0h      Re-Tuning Timer disabled
>>>>>> 1h      1 seconds
>>>>>> 2h      2 seconds
>>>>>> 3h      4 seconds
>>>>>> 4h      8 seconds
>>>>>> .....   ......................
>>>>>> n       2(n-1) seconds
>>>>>> .....   ......................
>>>>>> Bh      1024 seconds
>>>>>> Eh - Ch Reserved
>>>>>> Fh      Get information from other source
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for sharing this information, but unfortunate I don't
>>>>> understand much from it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the host driver intended to read/poll this register to find a good
>>>>> value?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can download the spec (and others) here [1]. sdhci currently implements
>>>> retuning mode 1, which is decribed in the spec:
>>>>
>>>> Re-Tuning Timer Control Example for Re-Tuning Mode 1
>>>> The initial value of re-tuning timer is provided by Timer Count for
>>>> Re-Tuning field in this register. The timer starts counting by loading the
>>>> initial value. When the timer expires, the Host Driver marks an expiration
>>>> flag. On receiving a command request, the Host driver checks the expiration
>>>> flag. If the expiration flag is set, then the Host Driver should perform the
>>>> re-tuning procedure before issuing a command. If the expiration flag is not
>>>> set, then the Host Driver issues a command without performing the re-tuning
>>>> procedure. Every time the re-tuning procedure is performed, the timer loads
>>>> the new initial value and the expiration flag is cleared.
>>>>
>>>> So the host controller could indeed update this register for subsequent
>>>> retuning.
>>>
>>> Arend, thanks for the link and information. So, I decided to go for a
>>> look in there.
>>>
>>> >From the same section you quoted above:
>>> ------
>>> (1) Re-Tuning Mode 1
>>> The host controller does not have any internal logic to detect when
>>> the re-tuning needs to be performed. In this case, the Host Driver
>>> should maintain all re-tuning timings by using a Re-Tuning Timer. To
>>> enable inserting the re-tuning procedure during data transfers, the
>>> data length per read/write command shall be limited up to 4MB.
>>> ------
>>>
>>> That means, we can't get _any_ help from the controller HW (in mode 1)
>>> to find a good value for the timer.
>>
>> In fact the timer value *is* defined in the Capabilities Register (Offset
>> 040h) bits 43-40 Timer Count for Re-Tuning
>>
>> It has been supported since 2011, see:
>>
>>         commit cf2b5eea1ea0ff9b3184bc6771bcb93a9fdcd1d9
>>         "mmc: sdhci: add support for retuning mode 1"
>>
> 
> The value from the register is also just randomly selected, only
> difference is that it's the HW that has randomly set it.

Presumably the value is chosen based on the maximum rate of temperature
change and the corresponding effect that has on the signal.

> 
> Even if the above commit was merged, I don't think it was the correct
> way of dealing with re-tuning.
> 
> First of all, re-tuning this is a mmc protocol specific thing should
> be managed from the mmc core, like the approach you have taken in your
> $subject patchset. Second I question whether the timer is useful at
> all.

The SD Host Controller Specification does not document another way to do
mode 1 re-tuning. The timer is it. Otherwise re-tuning is never done.

In the patches I sent, the driver must call mmc_retune_needed() to set
host->need_retune = 1 otherwise mmc_retune() does nothing.

I would like to extend the model to include transparently re-tuning and
re-trying when there is a CRC error, but that is a separate issue, not
documented in the spec but recommended by others.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-05 17:40 [RFC PATCH 00/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:40 ` [PATCH 01/13] mmc: core: Simplify by adding mmc_execute_tuning() Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:19   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:25   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 13:23     ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 14:22       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 14:36         ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 14:56           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 15:11             ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-13 15:41               ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 16:02                 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-14  9:47                   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-14  9:57                     ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-14 10:13                       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-14 12:24                         ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-01-14 12:59                           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-15 10:17                             ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-15 13:39                               ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-15 14:07                                 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-15 14:17                                   ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-15 14:46                                     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-15 14:59                                       ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-19  9:27                                         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-19  9:56                                           ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-14 12:38                         ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-14 12:52                           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-13 15:04         ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] mmc: core: Disable re-tuning when card is no longer initialized Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] mmc: core: Move mmc_card_removed() into mmc_start_request() Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:20   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] mmc: core: Add support for re-tuning before each request Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] mmc: core: Check re-tuning before retrying Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during switch commands Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during erase commands Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning while bkops ongoing Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] mmc: mmc: Comment that callers need to hold re-tuning if the card is put to sleep Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] mmc: core: Add support for HS400 re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] mmc: sdhci: Always init buf_ready_int Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:21   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-12-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] mmc: sdhci: Change to new way of doing re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-19 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2014-12-19 14:37   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-12 13:05   ` Adrian Hunter
2015-01-13 11:27 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B66015.1010507@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --cc=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox