From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Holler Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: print message if a card supports secure erase/trim Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:15:38 +0100 Message-ID: <54C7816A.8050800@ahsoftware.de> References: <1422359304-30321-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <54C77E69.7050600@ahsoftware.de> <20150127120855.GA9254@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h1446028.stratoserver.net ([85.214.92.142]:54522 "EHLO mail.ahsoftware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138AbbA0MPo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:15:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150127120855.GA9254@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Chris Ball , Ulf Hansson Am 27.01.2015 um 13:08 schrieb Borislav Petkov: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:02:49PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: >> Look at the source at the message which is printed just before and decide >> which one you find more informational / useful. > > I find such a message absolutely useless. Also, if it flies off and > printk buffer gets overwritten, it serves you sh*t. IOW, listen to what > Richard tells you. Ok. I shut/give up. Maybe you could be so nice to inform me where the similiar detail is exposed in sysfs for SSDs. Also it's unlikely I will send any further patch. There are still 21 from me where I've exposed sysfs attributes for NAND devices which are still not applied and most NAND devices still don't have a sysfs entry. So why should I waste my time again? Alexander Holler