public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
	Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>,
	Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:43:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D87320.6080104@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422522030-17793-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

On 29/01/15 11:00, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Here is V2 of some patches to move re-tuning support
> out of sdhci and into the core, and add support for HS400
> re-tuning.
> 
> Currently sdhci does re-tuning transparently by
> calling sdhci_execute_tuning() from its ->request()
> function.
> 
> The problem with HS400 re-tuning is that it must be
> done in HS200 mode. That means using switch commands
> and making ios changes. That means it potentially
> conflicts with other command sequences. The new
> re-tuning support accomodates that, however it is
> not strictly necessary because HS400 re-tuning
> should only be needed after runtime suspend when
> there would not be a conflict.
> 
> Nevertheless, this approach has more structure
> and potentially more flexibility.
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 
>     Added support to the block driver for re-tuning
>     and retrying after a CRC error. The host driver
>     is left to decide when an error indicates re-tuning
>     is needed. The block driver will retry a data request
>     once if re-tuning is flagged as needed.
> 
>     SDIO drivers need not be aware of re-tuning because
>     retrying will anyway cause re-tuning when re-tuning
>     is flagged as needed. Nevertheless SDIO drivers could
>     use the need_retune flag to instigate a retry when
>     otherwise they might not have.

Ulf, Arend, is this OK?



      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-09  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-29  9:00 [PATCH V2 00/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 01/15] " Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 02/15] mmc: core: Disable re-tuning when card is no longer initialized Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 03/15] mmc: core: Add support for re-tuning before each request Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 04/15] mmc: core: Check re-tuning before retrying Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 05/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during switch commands Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 06/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during erase commands Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 07/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning while bkops ongoing Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 08/15] mmc: mmc: Comment that callers need to hold re-tuning if the card is put to sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 09/15] mmc: core: Separate out the mmc_switch status check so it can be re-used Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 10/15] mmc: core: Add support for HS400 re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-02-04 13:35   ` [PATCH V3 " Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 11/15] mmc: sdhci: Change to new way of doing re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-06 12:51   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-09  8:37     ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-10 13:55       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-10 14:20         ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-23 12:54           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-23 14:26             ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-23 15:02               ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-23 21:11                 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-24 21:12                   ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-25 13:48                     ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-26 16:06                       ` Ulf Hansson
2015-03-27  9:54                         ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 12:04                           ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-24  2:49               ` NeilBrown
2015-03-24  9:40                 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 12/15] mmc: sdhci: Flag re-tuning is needed on CRC or End-Bit errors Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 13/15] mmc: block: Check re-tuning in the recovery path Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 14/15] mmc: block: Retry data requests when re-tuning is needed Adrian Hunter
2015-02-27 12:55   ` [PATCH V3 14/15] mmc: block: Retry errored " Adrian Hunter
2015-01-29  9:00 ` [PATCH V2 15/15] mmc: core: Don't print reset warning if reset is not supported Adrian Hunter
2015-02-09  9:33   ` Arend van Spriel
2015-02-09  9:47     ` Adrian Hunter
2015-02-09 16:05       ` Johan Rudholm
2015-02-09  8:43 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D87320.6080104@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --cc=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox