Re: [PATCH] mmc: sleep notification

[Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>]

On 03/12/2015 06:09 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>>> Also, I think we need to clarify one more point for this patch:
>>>> As was mentioned in commit message - Sleep_Notification can be interrupted
>>> by HPI.
>>>> This allows not blocking the host during the Sleep_Notification busy
>>>> time and allows accepting requests coming during this stage. Thus,
>>>> without having HPI supported, suspend/resume process might be
>>>> influenced by Sleep_Notification busy time, and this should not happen -
>>> suspend/resume should be done in very fast and not blocking manner.
>>>
>>> I fail to understand your comment here.
>>>
>>> Please tell me at what point(s) your think it make sense to issue the
>>> SLEEP_NOTIFICATION? If that is during the suspend phase, then a HPI request
>>> can't be triggered.
>>
>> I think SLEEP_NOTIFICATION should be issued on mmc_pm_notify() call,
>> on PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE case.
> 
> So, exactly why is that to prefer, comparing doing it in system PM
> ->suspend() callback?

Actually, i didn't know the benefit of this feature.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>