From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/15] mmc: core: Add support for re-tuning before each request
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:08:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551BDFD0.20800@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpxZ5mvy2Q+s62E0AadoUYvbtYLikxX4PGQf6M_0bBevA@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/04/15 13:13, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 27 March 2015 at 21:57, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> At the start of each request, re-tune if needed and
>> then hold off re-tuning again until the request is done.
>>
>> Note that though there is one function that starts
>> requests (mmc_start_request) there are two that wait for
>> the request to be done (mmc_wait_for_req_done and
>> mmc_wait_for_data_req_done). Also note that
>> mmc_wait_for_data_req_done can return even when the
>> request is not done (which allows the block driver
>> to prepare a newly arrived request while still
>> waiting for the previous request).
>>
>> This patch ensures re-tuning is held for the duration
>> of a request. Subsequent patches will also hold
>> re-tuning at other times when it might cause a
>> conflict.
>
> How about holding of re-tune from __mmc_claim_host() (after
> pm_runtime_get_sync() ) -> mmc_release_host(). Would that work? If so,
> that would simplify a lot around this.
I don't think it would work. The host is claimed both when we want to do
re-tuning (timer, CRC error, or host requests it) and when we want to
prevent it (in between dependent commands like erase, polling when card is
busy, SDIO card custom wake-up command).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-01 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 20:57 [PATCH V4 00/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 01/15] " Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 9:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-01 11:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 15:10 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-02 8:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 10:30 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-02 12:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 12:18 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-02 12:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 12:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-02 12:43 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-02 14:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-03 2:59 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-08 7:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-13 12:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-14 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-14 16:52 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-16 7:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-16 8:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-16 11:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 13:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 16:18 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-13 12:30 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-14 13:13 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 02/15] mmc: core: Disable re-tuning when card is no longer initialized Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 03/15] mmc: core: Add support for re-tuning before each request Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 10:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-01 12:08 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 04/15] mmc: core: Check re-tuning before retrying Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 05/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during switch commands Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 06/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during erase commands Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 07/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning while bkops ongoing Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 08/15] mmc: mmc: Comment that callers need to hold re-tuning if the card is put to sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 09/15] mmc: core: Separate out the mmc_switch status check so it can be re-used Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 10/15] mmc: core: Add support for HS400 re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 11/15] mmc: sdhci: Change to new way of doing re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 12/15] mmc: sdhci: Flag re-tuning is needed on CRC or End-Bit errors Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 13/15] mmc: block: Check re-tuning in the recovery path Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 14/15] mmc: block: Retry errored data requests when re-tuning is needed Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 15/15] mmc: core: Don't print reset warning if reset is not supported Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 6:21 ` [PATCH V4 00/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-04-10 10:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-10 10:52 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551BDFD0.20800@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).