From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>, Neil Brown <neil@brown.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 01/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:38:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552D183B.5080409@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFr+Q=tjL5NqDHr566cj7n4xNAt6Z3kEnyUFBfFtO-4Hvg@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/04/15 15:07, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 8 April 2015 at 09:42, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 02/04/15 17:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also SDIO cards can have a custom sleep state where tuning won't work.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our SDIO wifi device has such a state and it can only come out of it
>>>>>>>>>>> upon
>>>>>>>>>>> CMD52 write or CMD14 (ExitSleep).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So how will the mmc core know about these states? I guess we will
>>>>>>>>>> require SDIO func drivers to deal with enable/disable or hold/release
>>>>>>>>>> of re-tuning then?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is actually why in the past we tried to only kick off retuning
>>>>>>>>> before a
>>>>>>>>> request that requires use of data line(s) so mmc core (or sdhci) would not
>>>>>>>>> do re-tuning when SDIO func used CMD52 to wakeup the device. I never tried
>>>>>>>>> CMD14 approach and not even sure from which spec it comes (maybe eMMC).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's an interesting idea. It would eliminate the need for SDIO func
>>>>>>>> drivers to care about holding/releasing re-tuning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would be nice to hear about Adrian's thoughts around this as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't see how it would work because re-tuning is needed after the host
>>>>>>> controller runtime resumes. i.e. once the SDIO wifi card stops being active
>>>>>>> the host controller will runtime suspend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do we always need to re-tune from this phase?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What Arend points out is that we could "delay" the re-tune until we
>>>>>> know there is a DATA request. Wouldn't that work for SDHCI as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> You beat me to it, but that is indeed what I meant.
>>>>
>>>> The CMD line needs tuning too, so delaying tuning on every command will
>>>> cause errors. It is better to hold tuning for the specific command used to
>>>> wake-up.
>>>
>>> Hmm.
>>>
>>> This touches the discussion where Neil Brown also was involved, around
>>> how to handle "idle operations" for SDIO.
>>>
>>> How does SDIO func drivers detects "request inactivity", which
>>> triggers them to send its device to "sleep mode"? That answer should
>>> be runtime PM.
>>
>> Using runtime pm for custom sleep states would seem to conflict with its use
>> by the power domain. For example ACPI will enumerate embedded SDIO function
>> devices and link them to the ACPI power domain. Then ACPI will choose the
>> lowest power state for runtime suspend.
>>
>> It isn't obvious how a driver that doesn't know its power domain should
>> handle runtime pm, other than assuming it means power off.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "power off" in this context. Is that
I guess "power off" is the wrong term. They might have to assume they have
lost device context.
You should ask the power management mailing list what assumptions a device
driver can make about the use of runtime pm. If you do, please cc me.
> the power of the actual SDIO card? I don't think so, but I may be
> wrong.
I was talking about SDIO function devices.
>
> To enumerate a SDIO card the mmc core first needs to apply power to
> it. At this point the PM domain isn't yet attached to the SDIO func
> device (the device doesn't even exist yet) and thus it can't be used
> to provide power the card. Right?
In the ACPI case the SDIO function device ACPI nodes are children of the
host controller ACPI node. One possibility is to have the host controller
driver power on its children.
>
>>
>>>
>>> So, from mmc core perspective we should be able to get notifications
>>> through runtime PM callbacks (from mmc or sdio bus) to understand
>>> whether we need to hold of re-tune.
>>
>> That doesn't match the requirement. Re-tuning needs to be held for the
>> wake-up command, not while asleep.
>>
>
> Why should we ever want to re-tune if the card is in a sleep state?
> Isn't it better to postpone that until it wakes up?
That is what I was saying i.e. hold re-tuning for the wake-up command.
So if re-tuning is needed it is done after the wake-up command.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 20:57 [PATCH V4 00/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 01/15] " Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 9:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-01 11:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 15:10 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-02 8:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 10:30 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-02 12:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 12:18 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-02 12:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 12:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-02 12:43 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-02 14:00 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-03 2:59 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-08 7:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-13 12:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-14 13:38 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-04-14 16:52 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-04-16 7:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-16 8:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-16 11:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 13:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-02 16:18 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-13 12:30 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-14 13:13 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 02/15] mmc: core: Disable re-tuning when card is no longer initialized Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 03/15] mmc: core: Add support for re-tuning before each request Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 10:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-01 12:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 04/15] mmc: core: Check re-tuning before retrying Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 05/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during switch commands Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 06/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning during erase commands Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 07/15] mmc: core: Hold re-tuning while bkops ongoing Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 08/15] mmc: mmc: Comment that callers need to hold re-tuning if the card is put to sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 09/15] mmc: core: Separate out the mmc_switch status check so it can be re-used Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 10/15] mmc: core: Add support for HS400 re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 11/15] mmc: sdhci: Change to new way of doing re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 12/15] mmc: sdhci: Flag re-tuning is needed on CRC or End-Bit errors Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 13/15] mmc: block: Check re-tuning in the recovery path Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 14/15] mmc: block: Retry errored data requests when re-tuning is needed Adrian Hunter
2015-03-27 20:57 ` [PATCH V4 15/15] mmc: core: Don't print reset warning if reset is not supported Adrian Hunter
2015-04-01 6:21 ` [PATCH V4 00/15] mmc: host: Add facility to support re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-04-10 10:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-04-10 10:52 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552D183B.5080409@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).