From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Wait for data transfer after response errors Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:53:07 +0900 Message-ID: <55652383.2020204@samsung.com> References: <1431964402-27457-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:42943 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751309AbbE0BxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 21:53:09 -0400 In-reply-to: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson , Alim Akhtar Cc: Seungwon Jeon , Ulf Hansson , Alim Akhtar , Sonny Rao , Andrew Bresticker , Heiko Stuebner , Addy Ke , Alexandru Stan , Javier Martinez Canillas , Chris Zhong , Caesar Wang , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Hi, All. Thanks for your effort and sorry for late! On 05/27/2015 05:44 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Alim, > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> On peach-pi, I got a hung task once in 4 cold boot as [1]. > > OK, I'll have to get my peach-pi or peach-pit up and running again. I > ran out of desk space and I haven't gotten it set back up. :( > > I've been testing on an rk3288-based device. Past experience has > taught me that the rk3288 dw_mmc works differently than the exynos > one, so perhaps this is a difference. > > Could you possibly patch in something like > and provide the > console for the failure? I'll put it on my list to try this myself, > too I don't test with this..but if needs, i will test. It needs to fix the Alim's problem. > > >> I was checking on v4.1-rc5, git hash as below: >> >> 862e58a mmc: dw_mmc: Wait for data transfer after response errors >> ba155e2 Linux 4.1-rc5 >> 5b13966 >> >> Not sure if I missed any dependent patch?? > > I'm currently testing out of tree, but my dw_mmc is very close to mainline. > > >> Have not checked the dw TRM for this change, will do that as soon as I >> get access to it. > > OK, sounds good. I have some old version of the DesignWare TRM, so > possibly something is different in the newer one... Which version do you have? I also need to check the TRM version. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > > -Doug >