From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@gmail.com>,
Aisheng Dong <b29396@freescale.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: let GPIO based card detection have higher precedence
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:19:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558D273F.8020108@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435312810-23957-2-git-send-email-ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
On 26/06/15 13:00, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> Controller could have BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION quirk set, but drivers
> could use GPIO to detect card present state. Let, when defined, GPIO
> take precedence, so drivers could properly detect card state and not
> use polling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index bc14452..8bafb9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1601,15 +1601,18 @@ static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (host->flags & SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD)
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Try slot gpio detect, if defined it take precedence
> + * over build in controller functionality
> + */
> + if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd))
> + return !!gpio_cd;
> +
You've also put it above the MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE check which doesn't seem
right.
> /* If polling/nonremovable, assume that the card is always present. */
> if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION) ||
> (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
> return 1;
>
> - /* Try slot gpio detect */
> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd))
> - return !!gpio_cd;
> -
> /* Host native card detect */
> return !!(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) & SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT);
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-26 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-26 10:00 [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Card detection fixes Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: let GPIO based card detection have higher precedence Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:19 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2015-06-26 11:00 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 11:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-26 11:12 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci: don't use card state polling when CD GPIO is defined Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci: properly check card present state when quirk NO_CARD_NO_RESET is set Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-06-26 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Card detection fixes Jaehoon Chung
2015-06-26 11:05 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558D273F.8020108@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=b29396@freescale.com \
--cc=ivan.ivanov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.kryger@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).