From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Johan Rudholm <johan.rudholm@axis.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Fix init_card in 52Mhz
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:01:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560BDD17.4060102@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443603781.5148.0.camel@mhfsdcap03>
On 30/09/15 12:03, Chaotian Jing wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 11:24 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 30/09/15 06:28, Chaotian Jing wrote:
>>> Suppose that we got a data crc error, and it triggers the mmc_reset.
>>> mmc_reset will call mmc_send_status to see if HW reset was supported.
>>> before issue CMD13, it will do retune, and if EMMC was in HS400 mode,
>>> it will reduce frequency to 52Mhz firstly, that results in card init
>>> was doing at 52Mhz, So need ensure frequency is lower than 400Khz when
>>> re-init card.
>>
>> The call to mmc_send_status() was originally only done for mmc_test and
>> doesn't belong in a real reset. However the test parameter was removed
>> to simplify the code by:
>>
>> commit 83533ab28380f6957af39a7b322e639e42dbdaf1
>> Author: Johan Rudholm <johan.rudholm@axis.com>
>> Date: Mon Jan 12 15:38:04 2015 +0100
>>
>> mmc: core: always check status after reset
>>
>> Always check if the card is alive after a successful reset. This allows
>> us to remove mmc_hw_reset_check(), leaving mmc_hw_reset() as the only
>> card reset interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Rudholm <johanru@axis.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>>
>> IMHO having a test to check whether hw reset actually did reset the card
>> is useful, so I would suggest putting back mmc_hw_reset_check() and
>> removing the check from the non-test path.
>>
>> An alternative is to recognize that we don't want retuning here, and it is
>> unlikely to be needed in the mmc_test case. So if retuning is needed, just
>> skip the call to mmc_send_status() i.e.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> index f2d0c2ae85b1..c3749ba42739 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> @@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ static int mmc_reset(struct mmc_host *host)
>> host->ops->hw_reset(host);
>>
>> /* If the reset has happened, then a status command will fail */
>> - if (!mmc_send_status(card, &status)) {
>> + if (!host->need_retune && !mmc_send_status(card, &status)) {
>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> return -ENOSYS;
>> }
>>
>> Could then make mmc_test aware of that:
>>
>
>> This solution is better, please help to upstream it. Thx!
Then please, make it a patch, and test it and submit it. You can add:
Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
>> index b78cf5d403a3..7b105b97be78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c
>> @@ -2272,6 +2272,16 @@ static int mmc_test_hw_reset(struct mmc_test_card *test)
>> if (!mmc_card_mmc(card) || !mmc_can_reset(card))
>> return RESULT_UNSUP_CARD;
>>
>> + err = mmc_send_status(card, NULL);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + if (host->need_retune) {
>> + pr_info("%s: cannot test hw reset because retune needed\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>> + return RESULT_FAIL;
>> + }
>> +
>> err = mmc_hw_reset(host);
>> if (!err)
>> return RESULT_OK;
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> index f2d0c2ae85b1..c3749ba42739 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>> @@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ static int mmc_reset(struct mmc_host *host)
>> host->ops->hw_reset(host);
>>
>> /* If the reset has happened, then a status command will fail */
>> - if (!mmc_send_status(card, &status)) {
>> + if (!host->need_retune && !mmc_send_status(card, &status)) {
>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>> return -ENOSYS;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> index e726903..f2d0c2a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> @@ -1945,6 +1945,7 @@ static int mmc_reset(struct mmc_host *host)
>>>
>>> /* Set initial state and call mmc_set_ios */
>>> mmc_set_initial_state(host);
>>> + mmc_set_clock(host, host->f_init);
>>> mmc_host_clk_release(host);
>>>
>>> return mmc_init_card(host, card->ocr, card);
>>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 3:28 [PATCH] mmc: core: Fix init_card in 52Mhz Chaotian Jing
2015-09-30 8:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-09-30 9:03 ` Chaotian Jing
2015-09-30 13:01 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-08 6:41 Chaotian Jing
2015-10-08 6:51 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560BDD17.4060102@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=johan.rudholm@axis.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).