* [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices @ 2015-10-13 5:29 Heiko Schocher 2015-10-13 6:46 ` Lokesh Vutla 2015-10-13 13:59 ` Dirk Behme 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Heiko Schocher @ 2015-10-13 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Heiko Schocher, Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson On embedded devices, often there is a combination of removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if the removable device is available or not at boot time. E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the non-removable device and boot fast. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> --- Dirk Behme tried to bring this in, last mail I found: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/111022.html where Dirk worked in Arnds suggestion to use the "/aliases" device node" I adapt this to the omap_hsmmc driver. Is there another solution for this problem? Or why was this patch not accepted to mainline? drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 6 ++++++ include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c index c742cfd..62250d8 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c @@ -2106,7 +2106,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md; int devidx, ret; - devidx = find_first_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices); + devidx = find_next_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices, + card->host->devidx); if (devidx >= max_devices) return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC); __set_bit(devidx, dev_use); @@ -2124,7 +2125,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, * index anymore so we keep track of a name index. */ if (!subname) { - md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices); + md->name_idx = find_next_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices, + card->host->devidx); __set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use); } else md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c index 7fb0753..0b45b48 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c @@ -2059,6 +2059,12 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) host->pbias_enabled = 0; host->vqmmc_enabled = 0; + if (pdev->dev.of_node) { + ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "mmcblk"); + if (ret >= 0) + host->mmc->devidx = ret; + } + ret = omap_hsmmc_gpio_init(mmc, host, pdata); if (ret) goto err_gpio; diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h index 83b81fd..4f071681 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ struct mmc_host { int dsr_req; /* DSR value is valid */ u32 dsr; /* optional driver stage (DSR) value */ + /* preferred mmc block device index (mmcblkX) */ + unsigned int devidx; + unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned; }; -- 2.1.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices 2015-10-13 5:29 [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices Heiko Schocher @ 2015-10-13 6:46 ` Lokesh Vutla 2015-10-13 7:44 ` Heiko Schocher 2015-10-13 13:59 ` Dirk Behme 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Lokesh Vutla @ 2015-10-13 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Schocher, linux-kernel Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson, Menon, Nishanth +Nishanth, On Tuesday 13 October 2015 10:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > On embedded devices, often there is a combination of > removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard > wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware > configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if > the removable device is available or not at boot time. > > E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, > it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. > But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, > the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it > somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the > non-removable device and boot fast. Why not use "root=PARTUUID=${uuid}" option instead of relying on mmcblk no? U-Boot can easily detect your partuuid. Refer to [1] on how TI platforms does this in u-boot. [1] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=437bc42e7ff930dc4d4bd47199d2e823cf84bf4c;hp=85d17be374678ec37fd1e55db994a942e400dc80 Thanks and regards, Lokesh > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> > --- > Dirk Behme tried to bring this in, last mail I found: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/111022.html > where Dirk worked in Arnds suggestion to use the > "/aliases" device node" > > I adapt this to the omap_hsmmc driver. > > Is there another solution for this problem? > Or why was this patch not accepted to mainline? > > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 6 ++++-- > drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > index c742cfd..62250d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > @@ -2106,7 +2106,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, > struct mmc_blk_data *md; > int devidx, ret; > > - devidx = find_first_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices); > + devidx = find_next_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices, > + card->host->devidx); > if (devidx >= max_devices) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC); > __set_bit(devidx, dev_use); > @@ -2124,7 +2125,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, > * index anymore so we keep track of a name index. > */ > if (!subname) { > - md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices); > + md->name_idx = find_next_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices, > + card->host->devidx); > __set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use); > } else > md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *) > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > index 7fb0753..0b45b48 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > @@ -2059,6 +2059,12 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > host->pbias_enabled = 0; > host->vqmmc_enabled = 0; > > + if (pdev->dev.of_node) { > + ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "mmcblk"); > + if (ret >= 0) > + host->mmc->devidx = ret; > + } > + > ret = omap_hsmmc_gpio_init(mmc, host, pdata); > if (ret) > goto err_gpio; > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > index 83b81fd..4f071681 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ struct mmc_host { > int dsr_req; /* DSR value is valid */ > u32 dsr; /* optional driver stage (DSR) value */ > > + /* preferred mmc block device index (mmcblkX) */ > + unsigned int devidx; > + > unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned; > }; > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices 2015-10-13 6:46 ` Lokesh Vutla @ 2015-10-13 7:44 ` Heiko Schocher 2015-10-13 8:03 ` Lokesh Vutla 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Heiko Schocher @ 2015-10-13 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lokesh Vutla Cc: linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson, Menon, Nishanth Hello Lokesh, Am 13.10.2015 um 08:46 schrieb Lokesh Vutla: > +Nishanth, > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 10:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> On embedded devices, often there is a combination of >> removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard >> wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware >> configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if >> the removable device is available or not at boot time. >> >> E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, >> it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. >> But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, >> the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it >> somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the >> non-removable device and boot fast. > > Why not use "root=PARTUUID=${uuid}" option instead of relying on mmcblk no? > U-Boot can easily detect your partuuid. Refer to [1] on how TI platforms > does this in u-boot. Good tip ... I do not know, if it is possible to update U-Boot on this boards... Current U-Boot says: U-Boot 2013.01.01_heads/master-gc7900a0 (2015-05-06 - 20:37:15) I2C: ready DRAM: 512 MiB [...] U-Boot# mmc rescan U-Boot# mmc part Partition Map for MMC device 0 -- Partition Type: DOS Part Start Sector Num Sectors UUID Type 1 63 144522 000ce343-01 0e Boot 2 144585 659861 000ce343-02 83 U-Boot# part uuid mmc 0:2 uuid Unknown command 'part' - try 'help' U-Boot# So, if this patch has no chance for mainline, please let me know it, thanks! bye, Heiko > > [1] > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=437bc42e7ff930dc4d4bd47199d2e823cf84bf4c;hp=85d17be374678ec37fd1e55db994a942e400dc80 > > Thanks and regards, > Lokesh >> >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> >> --- >> Dirk Behme tried to bring this in, last mail I found: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/111022.html >> where Dirk worked in Arnds suggestion to use the >> "/aliases" device node" >> >> I adapt this to the omap_hsmmc driver. >> >> Is there another solution for this problem? >> Or why was this patch not accepted to mainline? >> >> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 6 ++++-- >> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 6 ++++++ >> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +++ >> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c >> index c742cfd..62250d8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c >> @@ -2106,7 +2106,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, >> struct mmc_blk_data *md; >> int devidx, ret; >> >> - devidx = find_first_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices); >> + devidx = find_next_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices, >> + card->host->devidx); >> if (devidx >= max_devices) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC); >> __set_bit(devidx, dev_use); >> @@ -2124,7 +2125,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, >> * index anymore so we keep track of a name index. >> */ >> if (!subname) { >> - md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices); >> + md->name_idx = find_next_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices, >> + card->host->devidx); >> __set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use); >> } else >> md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *) >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c >> index 7fb0753..0b45b48 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c >> @@ -2059,6 +2059,12 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> host->pbias_enabled = 0; >> host->vqmmc_enabled = 0; >> >> + if (pdev->dev.of_node) { >> + ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "mmcblk"); >> + if (ret >= 0) >> + host->mmc->devidx = ret; >> + } >> + >> ret = omap_hsmmc_gpio_init(mmc, host, pdata); >> if (ret) >> goto err_gpio; >> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h >> index 83b81fd..4f071681 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h >> @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ struct mmc_host { >> int dsr_req; /* DSR value is valid */ >> u32 dsr; /* optional driver stage (DSR) value */ >> >> + /* preferred mmc block device index (mmcblkX) */ >> + unsigned int devidx; >> + >> unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned; >> }; >> >> > -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices 2015-10-13 7:44 ` Heiko Schocher @ 2015-10-13 8:03 ` Lokesh Vutla 2015-10-13 13:24 ` Nishanth Menon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Lokesh Vutla @ 2015-10-13 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: hs Cc: linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson, Menon, Nishanth On Tuesday 13 October 2015 01:14 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Lokesh, > > Am 13.10.2015 um 08:46 schrieb Lokesh Vutla: >> +Nishanth, >> >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 10:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> On embedded devices, often there is a combination of >>> removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard >>> wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware >>> configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if >>> the removable device is available or not at boot time. >>> >>> E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, >>> it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. >>> But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, >>> the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it >>> somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the >>> non-removable device and boot fast. >> >> Why not use "root=PARTUUID=${uuid}" option instead of relying on >> mmcblk no? >> U-Boot can easily detect your partuuid. Refer to [1] on how TI platforms >> does this in u-boot. > > Good tip ... I do not know, if it is possible to update U-Boot > on this boards... > > Current U-Boot says: > U-Boot 2013.01.01_heads/master-gc7900a0 (2015-05-06 - 20:37:15) > > I2C: ready > DRAM: 512 MiB > [...] > U-Boot# mmc rescan > U-Boot# mmc part > > Partition Map for MMC device 0 -- Partition Type: DOS > > Part Start Sector Num Sectors UUID Type > 1 63 144522 000ce343-01 0e Boot > 2 144585 659861 000ce343-02 83 > U-Boot# part uuid mmc 0:2 uuid > Unknown command 'part' - try 'help' > U-Boot# > > So, if this patch has no chance for mainline, please let me > know it, thanks! > IIRC, Nishanth had posted a patch something similar but got rejected for some reason. Probably Nishanth can comment more here. Thanks and regards, Lokesh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices 2015-10-13 8:03 ` Lokesh Vutla @ 2015-10-13 13:24 ` Nishanth Menon 2015-10-13 14:00 ` Tom Rini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Nishanth Menon @ 2015-10-13 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lokesh Vutla Cc: hs, lkml, Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson, u-boot, Tom Rini On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Lokesh Vutla <a0131933@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 01:14 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> Hello Lokesh, >> >> Am 13.10.2015 um 08:46 schrieb Lokesh Vutla: >>> +Nishanth, >>> >>> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 10:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>>> On embedded devices, often there is a combination of >>>> removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard >>>> wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware >>>> configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if >>>> the removable device is available or not at boot time. >>>> >>>> E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, >>>> it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. >>>> But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, >>>> the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it >>>> somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the >>>> non-removable device and boot fast. >>> >>> Why not use "root=PARTUUID=${uuid}" option instead of relying on >>> mmcblk no? >>> U-Boot can easily detect your partuuid. Refer to [1] on how TI platforms >>> does this in u-boot. >> >> Good tip ... I do not know, if it is possible to update U-Boot >> on this boards... >> >> Current U-Boot says: >> U-Boot 2013.01.01_heads/master-gc7900a0 (2015-05-06 - 20:37:15) >> >> I2C: ready >> DRAM: 512 MiB >> [...] >> U-Boot# mmc rescan >> U-Boot# mmc part >> >> Partition Map for MMC device 0 -- Partition Type: DOS >> >> Part Start Sector Num Sectors UUID Type >> 1 63 144522 000ce343-01 0e Boot >> 2 144585 659861 000ce343-02 83 >> U-Boot# part uuid mmc 0:2 uuid >> Unknown command 'part' - try 'help' >> U-Boot# >> >> So, if this patch has no chance for mainline, please let me >> know it, thanks! >> > > IIRC, Nishanth had posted a patch something similar but got rejected for > some reason. Probably Nishanth can comment more here. > overall the feedback I received was for block devices, there is already an unique method(PARTUUID/uuid) of referencing required device and mmcxblky aliasing was not really needed - hence dropped my patch and switched over to partuuid. CC Tom and u-boot list as well. for reference the current thread: http://marc.info/?t=144471421700002&r=1&w=2 -- --- Regards, Nishanth Menon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices 2015-10-13 13:24 ` Nishanth Menon @ 2015-10-13 14:00 ` Tom Rini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2015-10-13 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Lokesh Vutla, hs, lkml, Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson, u-boot [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2725 bytes --] On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:24:08AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Lokesh Vutla <a0131933@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 01:14 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> Hello Lokesh, > >> > >> Am 13.10.2015 um 08:46 schrieb Lokesh Vutla: > >>> +Nishanth, > >>> > >>> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 10:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >>>> On embedded devices, often there is a combination of > >>>> removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard > >>>> wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware > >>>> configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if > >>>> the removable device is available or not at boot time. > >>>> > >>>> E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, > >>>> it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. > >>>> But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, > >>>> the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it > >>>> somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the > >>>> non-removable device and boot fast. > >>> > >>> Why not use "root=PARTUUID=${uuid}" option instead of relying on > >>> mmcblk no? > >>> U-Boot can easily detect your partuuid. Refer to [1] on how TI platforms > >>> does this in u-boot. > >> > >> Good tip ... I do not know, if it is possible to update U-Boot > >> on this boards... > >> > >> Current U-Boot says: > >> U-Boot 2013.01.01_heads/master-gc7900a0 (2015-05-06 - 20:37:15) > >> > >> I2C: ready > >> DRAM: 512 MiB > >> [...] > >> U-Boot# mmc rescan > >> U-Boot# mmc part > >> > >> Partition Map for MMC device 0 -- Partition Type: DOS > >> > >> Part Start Sector Num Sectors UUID Type > >> 1 63 144522 000ce343-01 0e Boot > >> 2 144585 659861 000ce343-02 83 > >> U-Boot# part uuid mmc 0:2 uuid > >> Unknown command 'part' - try 'help' > >> U-Boot# > >> > >> So, if this patch has no chance for mainline, please let me > >> know it, thanks! > >> > > > > IIRC, Nishanth had posted a patch something similar but got rejected for > > some reason. Probably Nishanth can comment more here. > > > > overall the feedback I received was for block devices, there is > already an unique method(PARTUUID/uuid) of referencing required device > and mmcxblky aliasing was not really needed - hence dropped my patch > and switched over to partuuid. Not telling the kernel what to do here but root=PARTUUID=$x is the long standing portable multi-architecture (and storage medium) way to have a stable name for your root device. The automatic way of digging this information out in U-Boot is dates back to Sept 2012 in mainline. -- Tom [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices 2015-10-13 5:29 [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices Heiko Schocher 2015-10-13 6:46 ` Lokesh Vutla @ 2015-10-13 13:59 ` Dirk Behme 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dirk Behme @ 2015-10-13 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Schocher, linux-kernel Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-mmc, Dirk Behme, Georg.Soffel, linux-omap, Ulf Hansson On 13.10.2015 07:29, Heiko Schocher wrote: > On embedded devices, often there is a combination of > removable mmc devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard > wired ones (e.g. eMMC). Depending on the hardware > configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might change if > the removable device is available or not at boot time. > > E.g. if the removable device is attached at boot time, > it might become mmxblk0. And the hard wired one mmcblk1. > But if the removable device isn't there at boot time, > the hard wired one will become mmcblk0. This makes it > somehow difficult to hard code the root device to the > non-removable device and boot fast. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> > --- > Dirk Behme tried to bring this in, last mail I found: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/111022.html > where Dirk worked in Arnds suggestion to use the > "/aliases" device node" The last attempt I remember is from last year http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26586.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26588.html I can't remember why this wasn't accepted, too. But maybe searching the archives will help answering that. Best regards Dirk > I adapt this to the omap_hsmmc driver. > > Is there another solution for this problem? > Or why was this patch not accepted to mainline? > > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 6 ++++-- > drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > index c742cfd..62250d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > @@ -2106,7 +2106,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, > struct mmc_blk_data *md; > int devidx, ret; > > - devidx = find_first_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices); > + devidx = find_next_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices, > + card->host->devidx); > if (devidx >= max_devices) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC); > __set_bit(devidx, dev_use); > @@ -2124,7 +2125,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card, > * index anymore so we keep track of a name index. > */ > if (!subname) { > - md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices); > + md->name_idx = find_next_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices, > + card->host->devidx); > __set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use); > } else > md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *) > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > index 7fb0753..0b45b48 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > @@ -2059,6 +2059,12 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > host->pbias_enabled = 0; > host->vqmmc_enabled = 0; > > + if (pdev->dev.of_node) { > + ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "mmcblk"); > + if (ret >= 0) > + host->mmc->devidx = ret; > + } > + > ret = omap_hsmmc_gpio_init(mmc, host, pdata); > if (ret) > goto err_gpio; > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > index 83b81fd..4f071681 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ struct mmc_host { > int dsr_req; /* DSR value is valid */ > u32 dsr; /* optional driver stage (DSR) value */ > > + /* preferred mmc block device index (mmcblkX) */ > + unsigned int devidx; > + > unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned; > }; > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-13 14:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-10-13 5:29 [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: fix initialization order of mmc block devices Heiko Schocher 2015-10-13 6:46 ` Lokesh Vutla 2015-10-13 7:44 ` Heiko Schocher 2015-10-13 8:03 ` Lokesh Vutla 2015-10-13 13:24 ` Nishanth Menon 2015-10-13 14:00 ` Tom Rini 2015-10-13 13:59 ` Dirk Behme
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).