From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:58:38 +0200 Message-ID: <565701FE.9010403@intel.com> References: <1430232341-8307-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:31621 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752455AbbKZNBt (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:01:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1430232341-8307-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson , Arend van Spriel Cc: linux-mmc On 28/04/15 17:45, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Here are 2 patches that allow brcmfmac to awake from a > custom sleep state that conflicts with re-tuning. > > The first patch adds sdio_retune_hold_now() and > sdio_retune_release(). They are used in the 2nd patch > to prevent re-tuning for the 'wake-up' command. > > > Adrian Hunter (2): > mmc: core: Add functions for SDIO to hold re-tuning > brcmfmac: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with 'wake-up' > > drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 6 ++++++ > drivers/mmc/core/host.h | 1 + > drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/mmc/sdio_func.h | 3 +++ > 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+) Hi These patches still apply and are still needed. Can they be applied? Regards Adrian