public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards simultaneously
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:44:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56810490.5020507@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqKkGpT0uiGP5BkZt-Z=Lphiu2Xeiv0Lsosti_XH-SKNw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2015/12/28 17:31, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 December 2015 at 04:05, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> On 2015/12/18 9:28, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2015 06:49 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 17 December 2015 at 20:47, Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To find the improved card detection times, I just used the kernel boot
>>>>>> log and checked the time stamps for when the cards get detected. I ran
>>>>>> the tests ~10 times and picked up some average values.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To notice the improvement you need at least two cards to be inserted
>>>>>> during boot. Perhaps you have a platform with one eMMC and one SD card
>>>>>> slot, you can test.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested the patch on one of our ARM bases SoC's. The SoC has an SD
>>>>> card slot on the first controller and an eMMC device on the second
>>>>> controller. I found ~100ms improvement on the time it took for the
>>>>> rootfs on the eMMC device to be ready for use. Interestingly, I did
>>>>> see the SD/eMMC order swap once in 20 tries. This is not an issue for
>>>>> us as we already have to use UUID for the eMMC rootfs in case an SD
>>>>> card is installed.
>>>>>
>>
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Thanks for helping out testing.
>
>> hi Ulf,
>>      I'm interested in this patch since I also spent a little time optimzing
>> the boot time and sequence for my local branch based on kernel 3.1x. With
>> you patch, it seems, the tablet only achieves very small improvement for the
>> SD controller(less than 20ms).
>>
>> My test environment:
>> Kernel: 3.14
>> Slot: 1 emmc(1st) + 1 SD card(2nd) + 1 sdio card(3rd)
>
> How much time you *gain* comparing to the original behaviour for each
> card, depends on the ->probe() order of your mmc hosts.
>
> I would guess that the host that holds the eMMC is the one being
> probed first, right?
> In general eMMC is quite fast to initialize, comparing to SD-cards and
> that's probably the reason to why you don't see that much
> improvements.
>

yes, my emmc is the first order to be probed. And sdio gain nearly 80ms 
with your patch.

No any problems found yet. So I think this patch is good :)

> Although, for your SDIO card you should see a greater improvement as
> this don't need to wait for your SD and eMMC to be initialized.
>
>>
>> I happen to run massive reboot test for my stable kernel branch this
>> weekend, so I will apply this patch to see if any problem occurs. :)
>>
>
> Great!
>
> As you haven't reported any problems, I suppose the tests went well!?
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin


      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-28  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-01 15:15 [PATCH] mmc: core: Optimize boot time by detecting cards simultaneously Ulf Hansson
2015-12-14 15:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-15 23:22   ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-12-16  9:07     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-17 19:47       ` Alan Cooper
2015-12-17 21:49         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-18  1:28           ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-12-18  3:05             ` Shawn Lin
2015-12-28  9:31               ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-28  9:44                 ` Shawn Lin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56810490.5020507@rock-chips.com \
    --to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox