From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569E073C.7080204@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrxM25QmbVEqnfRi+gjT6Jg_uAFXuO2xdCw6H2ST7EDZw@mail.gmail.com>
On 27/11/15 16:06, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 26 November 2015 at 13:58, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 28/04/15 17:45, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> Here are 2 patches that allow brcmfmac to awake from a
>>> custom sleep state that conflicts with re-tuning.
>>>
>>> The first patch adds sdio_retune_hold_now() and
>>> sdio_retune_release(). They are used in the 2nd patch
>>> to prevent re-tuning for the 'wake-up' command.
>>>
>>>
>>> Adrian Hunter (2):
>>> mmc: core: Add functions for SDIO to hold re-tuning
>>> brcmfmac: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with 'wake-up'
>>>
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 6 ++++++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++++
>>> include/linux/mmc/sdio_func.h | 3 +++
>>> 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> These patches still apply and are still needed.
>> Can they be applied?
>>
>
> I need to have yet another round of thinking about this, I will get
> back to as soon as I can.
I see drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c has moved but otherwise
these still apply. Any chance to look at this?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:45 [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-04-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Add functions for SDIO to hold re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2015-04-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] brcmfmac: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with 'wake-up' Adrian Hunter
2015-11-26 12:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] sdio: Prevent re-tuning conflicting with custom sleep Adrian Hunter
2015-11-27 14:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-01-19 9:51 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569E073C.7080204@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).