From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: use the defined function to check whether card is removable
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:38:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AAB49B.401@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454025177-21233-1-git-send-email-jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Hi Jaehoon,
On 2016/1/29 7:52, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> In linux/mmc/host.h, mmc_card_is_removable() is already defined.
> There is no reason that it doesn't use.
>
It's good to use it. But, I find some host drivers also use
"caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE". How about respin a patchset to
slove them ? :)
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index f95d41f..9da9b60 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -2532,7 +2532,7 @@ int mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
> if (!card)
> return 1;
>
> - if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE)
> + if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host))
> return 0;
>
> ret = mmc_card_removed(card);
> @@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> return;
>
> /* If there is a non-removable card registered, only scan once */
> - if ((host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && host->rescan_entered)
> + if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->rescan_entered)
> return;
> host->rescan_entered = 1;
>
> @@ -2587,8 +2587,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> * if there is a _removable_ card registered, check whether it is
> * still present
> */
> - if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead
> - && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
> + if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead && mmc_card_is_removable(host))
> host->bus_ops->detect(host);
>
> host->detect_change = 0;
> @@ -2613,7 +2612,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> mmc_bus_put(host);
>
> mmc_claim_host(host);
> - if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && host->ops->get_cd &&
> + if (mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->ops->get_cd &&
> host->ops->get_cd(host) == 0) {
> mmc_power_off(host);
> mmc_release_host(host);
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-29 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 23:52 [PATCH] mmc: core: use the defined function to check whether card is removable Jaehoon Chung
2016-01-29 0:38 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2016-02-02 13:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-02-04 5:56 ` Jaehoon Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56AAB49B.401@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox