From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mmc: core: Add a facility to "pause" re-tuning
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:03:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5731DC12.4090906@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrg3Fe8ypdzrbxD5DxHBNs7-6yVma-7X7NY4JfNzVzGPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/05/16 15:24, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 4 May 2016 at 13:38, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> Re-tuning is not possible when switched to the RPMB
>> partition. However re-tuning should not be needed
>> if re-tuning is done immediately before switching,
>> a small set of operations is done, and then we
>> immediately switch back to the main partition.
>>
>> To ensure that re-tuning can't be done for a short
>> while, add a facility to "pause" re-tuning.
>>
>> The existing facility to hold / release re-tuning
>> is used but it also flags re-tuning as needed to cause
>> re-tuning before the next command (which will be the
>> switch to RPMB).
>>
>> We also need to "unpause" in the recovery path, which
>> is catered for by adding it to mmc_retune_disable().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> index e0a3ee16c0d3..302e5858755a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> @@ -68,8 +68,30 @@ void mmc_retune_enable(struct mmc_host *host)
>> jiffies + host->retune_period * HZ);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Pause re-tuning for a small set of operations. The pause begins after the
>> + * next command and after first doing re-tuning.
>> + */
>> +void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host)
>> +{
>> + if (!host->retune_paused) {
>> + host->retune_paused = 1;
>> + mmc_retune_needed(host);
>> + mmc_retune_hold(host);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>
> When the mmc block device driver is built as a module, this doesn't
> build. I will drop the series from my next branch to sort this out.
Oops. Sorry!
> Should we export these via EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, or implement them as
> inline functions?
They need to be exported. I tend to go with what else is in the same file
i.e. host.c is exporting using EXPORT_SYMBOL()
>
> This also made me think about the SDIO/WLAN driver issue, during
> system PM suspend/resume, which also needed temporary to disable
> re-tuning.
>
> *If* we are going to export these, I want to make it works for the
> SDIO case well...
SDIO case is slightly different, and SDIO uses its own header file sdio_func.h.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> +void mmc_retune_unpause(struct mmc_host *host)
>> +{
>> + if (host->retune_paused) {
>> + host->retune_paused = 0;
>> + mmc_retune_release(host);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> void mmc_retune_disable(struct mmc_host *host)
>> {
>> + mmc_retune_unpause(host);
>> host->can_retune = 0;
>> del_timer_sync(&host->retune_timer);
>> host->retune_now = 0;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> index 85800b48241f..45cde8cd39f2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>> @@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>> unsigned int can_retune:1; /* re-tuning can be used */
>> unsigned int doing_retune:1; /* re-tuning in progress */
>> unsigned int retune_now:1; /* do re-tuning at next req */
>> + unsigned int retune_paused:1; /* re-tuning is temporarily disabled */
>>
>> int rescan_disable; /* disable card detection */
>> int rescan_entered; /* used with nonremovable devices */
>> @@ -526,4 +527,7 @@ static inline void mmc_retune_recheck(struct mmc_host *host)
>> host->retune_now = 1;
>> }
>>
>> +void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host);
>> +void mmc_retune_unpause(struct mmc_host *host);
>> +
>> #endif /* LINUX_MMC_HOST_H */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 11:38 [PATCH V2 0/3] mmc: block: Fix tuning (by avoiding it) for RPMB Adrian Hunter
2016-05-04 11:38 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] mmc: core: Add a facility to "pause" re-tuning Adrian Hunter
2016-05-10 12:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-05-10 13:03 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2016-05-11 6:48 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-05-11 9:00 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-12 6:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-12 13:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-05-12 13:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-16 12:35 ` [PATCH V3 " Adrian Hunter
2016-05-17 15:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-05-18 6:44 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-04 11:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] mmc: block: Always switch back to main area after RPMB access Adrian Hunter
2016-05-04 11:38 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] mmc: block: Pause re-tuning while switched to the RPMB partition Adrian Hunter
2016-05-04 11:54 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] mmc: block: Fix tuning (by avoiding it) for RPMB Winkler, Tomas
2016-05-10 10:28 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5731DC12.4090906@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).