From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:53:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57479A84.4080207@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464232091-24882-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Hi Shawn,
On 05/26/2016 12:08 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
> mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
> check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
> dw_mci_init_slot for noremovable devices, but there is a timing
> gap before it really calls dw_mci_get_cd as mmc_detect_change needs
> some delay here.
What's unnecessary mmc_request?
>
> Another gain here is that we could save some checkings of card status
> after sd card been removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index cb30e91..2940d24 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
> static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
> static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
> static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
> +static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> @@ -1248,6 +1249,8 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>
> WARN_ON(slot->mrq);
>
> + dw_mci_get_cd(mmc);
> +
If my understanding is right, it can be replaced
if (!test_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags))
to
if (!dw_mci_get_cd(mmc))
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> /*
> * The check for card presence and queueing of the request must be
> * atomic, otherwise the card could be removed in between and the
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-27 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20160526030949epcas1p4960ec32140a9ac70ff7616031d667cfe@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2016-05-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request Shawn Lin
2016-05-27 0:53 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2016-05-27 2:26 ` Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57479A84.4080207@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox