From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 resend 3/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add DMI based blacklist
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79c2dabc-e319-aa54-3501-ff8b7c84974d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d4ba40a-043c-3543-33d5-40887b4c3363@redhat.com>
On 08-06-17 12:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07-06-17 15:09, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 24/05/17 13:47, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Add a DMI based blacklist for systems where probing some sdio interfaces
>>> is harmful (e.g. causes pci-e based wifi to not work).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> -Adjust for changes in mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add fix_up_power_blacklist module option
>>> -Only use a single fix_up_power_dmi_blacklist for the GPDwin further testing
>>> has shown that the DMI strings are unique enough that we do not need the
>>> bios-date in there
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> -Adjust for changes to "mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add blacklist module option"
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>>> index 3a7d979a306d..45455abc7ca6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/pm.h>
>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>>> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>>> #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>>> @@ -381,6 +382,28 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id sdhci_acpi_ids[] = {
>>> };
>>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sdhci_acpi_ids);
>>> +static const struct dmi_system_id fix_up_power_dmi_blacklist[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Match for the GPDwin which unfortunately uses somewhat
>>> + * generic dmi strings, which is why we test for 4 strings.
>>> + * Comparing against 23 other byt/cht boards, board_vendor
>>> + * and board_name are unique to the GPDwin, where as only one
>>> + * other board has the same board_serial and 3 others have
>>> + * the same default product_name. Also the GPDwin is the
>>> + * only device to have both board_ and product_name not set.
>>> + */
>>> + .driver_data = "80860F14:2",
>>> + .matches = {
>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_SERIAL, "Default string"),
>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Default string"),
>>
>> I can't accept that this is an accurate way to identify the board.
>
> Well as I already mentioned when I first submitted this patch-set this
> patch-set fixes a regression. When I first installed Linux on this
> system, the wifi just worked, until this commit got merged:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=db52d4f8a4bde36263a7cc9d46ff20b243562ac9
>
> Given the kernel's no regressions policy I see only 2 ways to fix this
> something like this patch, or revert the commit causing the regression.
p.s.
Given that this is a regression it would be nice if we could speedup
the review process of this patch-set a bit so that we can get this
regression fixed soon. Sofar the review of this patch-set has been
somewhat slow I must say.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-08 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 10:47 [PATCH v3 resend 0/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Fix sdhci-acpi breaking pci-e based wifi on the GPD-win Hans de Goede
2017-05-24 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 resend 1/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Remove unneeded acpi_bus_get_status() call Hans de Goede
2017-06-08 13:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-24 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 resend 2/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add blacklist module option Hans de Goede
2017-06-07 12:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-06-08 9:45 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-08 12:12 ` Hans de Goede
2017-05-24 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 resend 3/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add DMI based blacklist Hans de Goede
2017-06-07 13:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-06-08 10:20 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-08 10:55 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-06-08 18:51 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79c2dabc-e319-aa54-3501-ff8b7c84974d@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox