From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Petr Cvek <petr.cvek@tul.cz>
Cc: vinod.koul@intel.com, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] dmaengine: pxa_dma: + mmc: pxamci: race condition with DMA error on tx channel
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:43:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f3zwwgo.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e749aff1-0ffc-c9ed-42b2-82397b4e8ba2@tul.cz> (Petr Cvek's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:57:08 +0100")
Petr Cvek <petr.cvek@tul.cz> writes:
Hi Petr,
> I wasn't able to track the problem to a single patch as the problem occurs at
> random time (from the boot to like a half an hour) and it's maybe dependent on a
> level of a battery charge (maybe because of kernel log writes of charging
> messages).
Mmmh, long reproduction time, that will be bad.
> It seems that most occurrency is during writes on an SD card. Using an SDHC
> card decreases the time to fail. After failure the OS is unavailable (rootfs
> in on the card).
Okay, let me try to make write loop on my SD card to see if I manage to
reproduce this.
> From my poking in the kernel source code it seems there is a probability that pxamci_irq() takes longer to call and its subsequent call pxamci_data_done() isn't fast enough to set [1]
> host->data = NULL;
> From the DMA side, the DMA done interrupt is generated:
> pxad_chan_handler() -> vchan_cookie_complete()
> ...where a tasklet for vchan_complete() is scheduled
At least that seems to hint the DMA part is sound so for.
The bothering part is the log error "mmc0: DMA error on tx channel". I would
need a bit of guidance here, with the same log with [1] applied.
> , where finally with interrupts enabled (can pxamci_irq() be called here?) the
> callback pxamci_dma_irq() is called.
When DMA completes, there is a tiny window, before pxamci_dma_irq() is called,
when pxamci_irq() can be called, yes. As soon as the spinlock is taken in
pxamci_dma_irq() is taken, no more races.
> From my tests it seems at this point [2] the host->data is always NULL and rest
> of the callback is never called. It is called once with a nonempty host->data
> only just before the failure.
>
> During the testing I put udelay(100) at the start of pxamci_dma_irq() and fail
> occurred after like 2 hours (when I for the first time tapped the touchscreen -
> higher CPU usage and interrupts).
Mmm I would need more data here.
The biggest help I could get would be the pxa dma traces here :
echo -n 'file pxa_dma.c +p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
echo -n 'file virt-dma.c +p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control
And then capture the last traces and send them to me.
Cheers.
--
Robert
[1] Small debug patch
---8>---
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
index c763b404510f..ed3812b2a34d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
@@ -571,8 +571,9 @@ static void pxamci_dma_irq(void *param)
if (likely(status == DMA_COMPLETE)) {
writel(BUF_PART_FULL, host->base + MMC_PRTBUF);
} else {
- pr_err("%s: DMA error on %s channel\n", mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
- host->data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ ? "rx" : "tx");
+ pr_err("%s: DMA error on %s channel: %d\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
+ host->data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ ? "rx" : "tx", status);
host->data->error = -EIO;
pxamci_data_done(host, 0);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 6:57 [BUG] dmaengine: pxa_dma: + mmc: pxamci: race condition with DMA error on tx channel Petr Cvek
2017-03-08 16:43 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2017-03-10 0:49 ` Petr Cvek
2017-03-14 21:11 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-03-26 2:43 ` Petr Cvek
2017-04-06 6:42 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877f3zwwgo.fsf@belgarion.home \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petr.cvek@tul.cz \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox