From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: card: Adding support for sanitize in eMMC 4.5 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:20:54 -0400 Message-ID: <877gkipebd.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1361705927-10524-1-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> <26E7A31274623843B0E8CF86148BFE32B02F5779@NTXAVZMBX04.azit.micron.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <26E7A31274623843B0E8CF86148BFE32B02F5779@NTXAVZMBX04.azit.micron.com> (Luca Porzio's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:36:55 +0000") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Luca Porzio (lporzio)" Cc: Yaniv Gardi , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "vgoyal@redhat.com" , "tj@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Yaniv, Maya, On Mon, Mar 11 2013, Luca Porzio (lporzio) wrote: > In case of Sanitize timeout, the eMMC might go in an unclear state. > May I suggest to: > - issue an HPI before leaving thus bring the eMMC back into safe status > - report the 'sanitize not complete error' and let the user decide on > Whether he wants to re-issue (i.e. continue) the sanitize or just let > it go. Can you respond to this review feedback from Luca, please? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child