From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] omap3/omap4 hsmmc: Register offset handling Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:44:30 -0700 Message-ID: <87eida4ysh.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <23570.10.24.255.18.1283190527.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com> <4C80A76F.3060108@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: (kishore kadiyala's message of "Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:39 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: kishore kadiyala Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" , "Kadiyala, Kishore" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "Chikkature Rajashekar, Madhusudhan" , "adrian.hunter@nokia.com" List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org kishore kadiyala writes: > Hi Benoit > > > >>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 while (!(omap_readl(base + reg_off)& >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0MMCHS_SYSSTATUS_= RESETDONE)) >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 cpu_relax(); >> >> Why does that series not seems to be based on your hwmod migration? = The >> reset is fully handle by the hwmod framework now. > > Agree. But Kevin has suggested to post this patch independent of hw= mod. > Does this patch has to go in hwmod series ? I suggested that this register conversion patch could be merged before the hwmod conversion as it is independent of that. The hwmod conversion (based on this series) would then just remove the reset from here. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html