From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdhci-acpi initialization performance regression Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:09:08 -0400 Message-ID: <87fvyvfwor.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1365082866-28404-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:57293 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752539Ab3DLSJR (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:09:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1365082866-28404-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (Adrian Hunter's message of "Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:41:04 +0300") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Hunter Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , Namjae Jeon , Sergey Yanovich , Jaehoon Chung Hi Adrian, On Thu, Apr 04 2013, Adrian Hunter wrote: > When I submitted the sdhci-acpi driver, it's initialization performance > was satisfactory. Now it is not. Here are 2 fixes to restore that > regression. > > Adrian Hunter (2): > Revert "mmc: core: wait while adding MMC host to ensure root mounts successfully" > mmc: core: fix performance regression initializing MMC host controllers > > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 2 ++ > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks, both pushed to mmc-next (using v4 of patch 2/2) for 3.10. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child