Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

[Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>]

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com wrote:
> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by
> Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for
> cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings.

In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you
receive into the patches when you resend them.  Thanks!

> I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already
> documented and it will concern all drivers.

Agreed.  It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it.

> Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree,
> isn't it?

Yes, let's do that.  I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you
can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child