From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:14:23 -0400 Message-ID: <87hasexegg.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1343136606-8874-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:36502 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755426Ab2HHDO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 23:14:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1343136606-8874-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> (ludovic desroches's message of "Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:30:02 +0200") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com Hi, On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Hello, > > I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by > Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for > cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings. In future, it's helpful for me if you can add the Acked-by lines you receive into the patches when you resend them. Thanks! > I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common binding already > documented and it will concern all drivers. Agreed. It's a documented core MMC binding, it's fine to use it. > Chris are you agree to take patch 1/4? Others patches may go to at91 tree, > isn't it? Yes, let's do that. I've applied patch 1/4 to mmc-next for 3.7, and you can send the others via the at91 tree with the ACK that Arnd gave. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child