From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sh_mmcif: Support MMC_SLEEP_AWAKE command Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:21:03 -0400 Message-ID: <87k3z24i7k.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1339534569-27923-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:55608 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752439Ab2FTGVH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:21:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:27:54 +0200 (CEST)") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Laurent Pinchart , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jun 13 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> The MMC_SLEEP_AWAKE and SD_IO_SEND_OP_COND commands share the same >> opcode. SD_IO_SEND_OP_COND isn't supported by the SH MMCIF, but >> MMC_SLEEP_AWAKE is. Discriminate between the two commands using the >> command flags, and reject SD_IO_SEND_OP_COND only. >> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.6. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child