From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>,
Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sd: Fix sd current limit setting
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:28:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87liihocxj.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120718050939.GA30490@srdclcs1.amd.com> (Aaron Lu's message of "Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:09:39 +0800")
Hi Aaron,
On Wed, Jul 18 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Is the following patch OK? This is based on top of current mmc-next with
> the previous one in tree. Not sure if this is what you want though.
Yes, that's perfect; squashed into the original patch and pushed out
to mmc-next. Thanks!
Having there be so many MAX_CURRENT defines -- and having them be
split in the middle between CAP_ and CAP2_ -- is starting to feel
a bit awkward. Does anyone have ideas on how that might be tidied
up, since we have an opportunity to come up with a better plan
before this gets merged soon?
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 6:16 [PATCH 0/2] SD current limit setting fix Aaron Lu
2012-07-03 6:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Simplify and fix for SD switch processing Aaron Lu
2012-07-04 0:48 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-03 6:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sd: Fix sd current limit setting Aaron Lu
2012-07-03 14:18 ` Philip Rakity
2012-07-04 0:52 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-04 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 " Aaron Lu
2012-07-09 1:23 ` Philip Rakity
2012-07-10 2:57 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 9:34 ` [PATCH " Girish K S
2012-07-17 13:43 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-17 15:43 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-18 5:09 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-18 5:28 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2012-07-18 6:22 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-19 2:41 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-19 3:47 ` Philip Rakity
2012-07-19 6:25 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-19 4:47 ` Girish K S
2012-07-19 5:03 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87liihocxj.fsf@octavius.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prakity@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox