From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] Powerpc eSDHC: Use u64 to calculate the timeout value to avoid overflow Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:49:30 -0500 Message-ID: <87mwy58nud.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1353303061-16679-1-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> <1353303061-16679-2-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:47541 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753367Ab2KYTtg (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:49:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1353303061-16679-2-git-send-email-Haijun.Zhang@freescale.com> (Haijun Zhang's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:31:00 +0800") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Haijun Zhang Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Jerry Huang Hi, On Mon, Nov 19 2012, Haijun Zhang wrote: > As some mmc cards need large timeout value usually a few seconds, > so data timeout nanosecond will overflow with u32 variable and > give the wrong timeout value, so use u64 will be safe. > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang > Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.8. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child