From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 v3] mmc: tmio/sdhi: hotplug & PM Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:55:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87obrwbw08.fsf@laptop.org> References: <1328824636-10553-1-git-send-email-g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Chris Ball's message of "Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:17:12 -0500") Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 08 2012, Chris Ball wrote: >> Guennadi Liakhovetski (10): >> mmc: simplify mmc_cd_gpio_request() by removing two parameters >> mmc: tmio: calculate the native hotplug condition only once >> mmc: tmio_mmc: support the generic MMC GPIO card hotplug helper >> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: pass card hotplug GPIO number to TMIO MMC >> ARM: mach-shmobile: convert mackerel to use the generic MMC GPIO >> hotplug helper >> ARM: mach-shmobile: convert ag5evm to use the generic MMC GPIO >> hotplug helper >> mmc: tmio_mmc: power status flag doesn't have to be exposed in >> platform data >> mmc: tmio_mmc: remove unused sdio_irq_enabled flag >> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: do not manage PM clocks manually >> mmc: tmio: cosmetic: prettify the tmio_mmc_set_ios() function > > Looks like you didn't get any ACKs for these, and the ARM patches no > longer apply -- would you like me to take all but the two ARM patches > and leave those to you? (Does that result in working systems?) I've applied all of these except 5/6 to mmc-next for 3.4 now, thanks. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child