From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:36:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87pqa21wow.fsf@laptop.org> References: <1337183519-25459-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <1337183519-25459-3-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <87k40b3ris.fsf@laptop.org> <4FB54366.80409@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FB54366.80409@atmel.com> (ludovic desroches's message of "Thu, 17 May 2012 20:28:54 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "ludovic.desroches" Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, May 17 2012, ludovic.desroches wrote: >>> + remove soon (for more information have a look to >> ^ removed >>> + Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt). Please use >>> + MMC_ATMEL_MCI. >>> >>> If unsure, say N. > > Sorry for the typo, do you want a new patch or is ok? It's okay, I've fixed it up here. >> Seems like I should take this patch 2/2, and then someone else should >> merge 1/2? > > Yes, Nicolas would probably take patch 2/2. I think you must mean that Nicolas takes 1/2 (the arch/arm/ patches). Assuming you do, that's fine and I've pushed 2/2 to mmc-next for 3.5 now. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child