public inbox for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: pxamci: prepare and unprepare the clocks
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:28:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sikb4gi5.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpaX4UHW-_z=yy7UA1Xuv2LZqQkttJ-tWugZYSXD4VwiQ@mail.gmail.com> (Ulf Hansson's message of "Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:49:03 +0200")

Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> writes:

> I understand your concern, but I don't see why there should be any
> major difference in clock management code (clk tree wise), due to this
> patch. It worked before, so likely it will work now!?

It will ony work *differently*, it will change the clock management. It won't
break, but again it's *not* the purpose of the patch.  The patch is aimed at
removing a warning.

As for the clock management, it will the change the behaviour :
Let's see the current clock management :
 - pxamci_probe()
   => clock is disabled
   mmc_add_host()
     mmc_start_host()
       mmc_power_up() (as pxamci is unaware of caps2)
       Here the comment of the function is (drivers/mmc/core/core.c:1534):
       "First, we enable power to the card without the clock running"
       => this won't be true if the clock is enabled in pxamci_probe()
       mmc_set_ios(host, host->ios.clock=host->f_init)
         pxamci_set_ios()
           clk_enable()
             => here the clock is enabled, enable_count=1
       mmc_host_clk_release()
         pxamci_set_ios()
             => here the clock is disabled, enable_count=0

Let's see the your proposal clock management :
 - pxamci_probe()
   => clock is enabled
   mmc_add_host()
     mmc_start_host()
       mmc_power_up() (as pxamci is unaware of caps2)
       mmc_set_ios(host, host->ios.clock=host->f_init)
         pxamci_set_ios()
           clk_enable()
             => here the clock is enabled twice, enable_count=2
       mmc_host_clk_release()
         pxamci_set_ios()
             => here the clock *remains enabled*, enable_count=1

- time passes with clock enabled

So I think there is a difference, unless my understand of the MMC core stack is wrong.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-01 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09 19:56 [PATCH] mmc: pxamci: prepare and unprepare the clocks Robert Jarzmik
2014-09-01  9:09 ` Robert Jarzmik
2014-09-01 10:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-09-01 12:20   ` Robert Jarzmik
2014-09-01 12:49     ` Ulf Hansson
2014-09-01 13:28       ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2014-09-02  7:53         ` Ulf Hansson
2014-09-02  9:02           ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sikb4gi5.fsf@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox