From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc-pltfm: include 'dw_mmc-pltfm.h' Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:41:27 -0400 Message-ID: <87sixyqvx4.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <000e01ce9247$d6063f30$8212bd90$@samsung.com> <001601ce9504$c4da6d20$4e8f4760$%jun@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:40345 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755400Ab3HYDld (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:41:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <001601ce9504$c4da6d20$4e8f4760$%jun@samsung.com> (Seungwon Jeon's message of "Fri, 09 Aug 2013 22:31:35 +0900") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Seungwon Jeon Cc: 'Jingoo Han' , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, 'Jaehoon Chung' , 'Dan Carpenter' , 'Dinh Nguyen' Hi Seungwon, On Fri, Aug 09 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > On Tue, August 06, 2013,Jingoo Han wrote: >> Include 'dw_mmc-pltfm.h' header file in order to fix >> the following sparse warnings: >> >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c:36:5: warning: symbol >> dw_mci_pltfm_register' was not declared. Should >> it be static? >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c:94:1: warning: symbol >> dw_mci_pltfm_pmops' was not declared. Should it >> be static? >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c:118:5: warning: symbol >> dw_mci_pltfm_remove' was not declared. Should >> it be static? >> >> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter >> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han > > Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.12. - Chris. -- Chris Ball