From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: fix sdhci-dove removal Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:49:22 -0400 Message-ID: <87vcdtosnx.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <20121015094348.GP21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121015103725.GQ21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121015104456.GR21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87txtdq90y.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121029214307.GH21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:53386 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933029Ab2J2Vt1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:49:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20121029214307.GH21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:43:07 +0000") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth Hi, On Mon, Oct 29 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Anyway, here's a replacement patch, updated against my cubox tree but > lacking the cubox gpio changes for it. Un-tested through: (a) I can't > test this on its own on the cubox, (b) I don't have a separate dove > tree to test it against and my disk space is all but out at the moment > for yet another build tree... Compile-tested and pushed to mmc-next, and I'll submit it for 3.7 if I get a Tested-by from someone like Sebastian (CC'd), or for 3.8 if I don't. (I'll add sdhci-pltfm API rework to my TODO list, too.) Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child