From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC: sdhci-dove: allow GPIOs to be used for card detection on Dove Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:06:39 -0500 Message-ID: <87zk1tg5tc.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <20121122235426.GT3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121123083117.GA25754@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20121123085726.GK5764@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121123121422.GA26168@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20121123125507.GO5764@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <871ufh8lza.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <87y5hfhrwg.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:42110 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753308Ab2LDQGs (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:06:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:00:49 +0100 (CET)") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Shawn Guo , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Mike Rapoport , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Guennadi, On Tue, Dec 04 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> They both sound pretty attractive. Maybe we start out with (1), which >> would create a patch we could more reasonably send to stable@ to get >> slot-gpio handling the reset during transfers properly in older kernels, >> and then refactor into (2) later? > > Just posted 3 patches for this, have a look if that's what you were > thinking about. Not sure though why this is needed for stable, but I'm > probably just missing some crucial information on the topic. Thanks! I'll take a look. I agree that this isn't definitely needed in -stable, but I'm glad we have the option if someone finds that their host isn't functioning after card removal during a transfer. Russell, are you happy with switching sdhci-dove over to slot-gpio with this patchset? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child