From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <ssundark@amd.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Sen, Pankaj" <Pankaj.Sen@amd.com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>,
"Agrawal, Nitesh-kumar" <Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD eMMC-4.5.1
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:01:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9edba1b9-638d-c8a3-ad3f-43b4635eeb8e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13d2d300-de73-cdc8-3d3a-1fdc2cfcd205@amd.com>
On 15/11/16 08:57, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> This patch adds support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD eMMC-4.5.1
>
> Reviewed-by: Sen, Pankaj <Pankaj.Sen@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> index 782c8d2..1a31bdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
> @@ -817,6 +817,170 @@ enum amd_chipset_gen {
> AMD_CHIPSET_UNKNOWN,
> };
>
> +static const struct sdhci_ops amd_sdhci_pci_ops;
You shouldn't need this. Just put amd_sdhci_pci_ops in the right place.
> +
> +struct amd_tuning_descriptor {
> + u8 tune_around;
> + bool this_tune_ok;
> + bool last_tune_ok;
> + u8 valid_front;
> + u8 valid_window_max;
> + u8 tune_low_max;
> + u8 tune_low;
> + u8 valid_window;
> + u8 tune_result;
> +};
> +
> +static int amd_tuning_reset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> + val |= SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE | SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> + sdhci_writew(host, val, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +
> + val = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> + val &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING;
> + sdhci_writew(host, val, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_config_tuning_phase(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 phase)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, &val);
> + val &= ~0x1f;
> + val |= (0x10800 | (phase << 1));
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, val);
It wouldn't hurt to #define registers and bit fields.
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_find_good_phase(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + struct amd_tuning_descriptor *td = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
> +
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (td->this_tune_ok)
> + td->valid_front += 1;
So now valid_front is never reset ?
> + if ((!td->this_tune_ok && td->last_tune_ok) ||
> + (td->tune_around == 11)) {
> + if (td->valid_window > td->valid_window_max) {
> + td->valid_window_max = td->valid_window;
> + td->tune_low_max = td->tune_low;
> + }
> + }
> + if (td->this_tune_ok && (!td->last_tune_ok))
> + td->tune_low = td->tune_around;
> + if (!td->this_tune_ok && td->last_tune_ok)
> + td->valid_window = 0;
> + else if (td->this_tune_ok)
> + td->valid_window += 1;
> +
> + td->last_tune_ok = td->this_tune_ok;
> +
> + if (td->tune_around == 11) {
> + if ((td->valid_front + td->valid_window) >
> + td->valid_window_max) {
> + if (td->valid_front > td->valid_window)
> + td->tune_result = ((td->valid_front -
> + td->valid_window) >> 1);
> + else
> + td->tune_result = td->tune_low +
> + ((td->valid_window + td->valid_front) >> 1);
> + } else {
> + td->tune_result = td->tune_low_max +
> + (td->valid_window_max >> 1);
> + }
So tune_result doesn't need to be in amd_tuning_descriptor.
It is not at all obvious why you need to retain amd_tuning_descriptor
between calls to amd_execute_tuning. Please explain.
> +
> + if (td->tune_result > 0x0b)
> + td->tune_result = 0x0b;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, &val);
> + val &= ~0x1f;
> + val |= (0x10800 | (td->tune_result << 1));
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xb8, val);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_enable_manual_tuning(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
> + unsigned int val;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xd0, &val);
> + val &= 0xffffffcf;
No need to set the bits to 0 if you are then going to OR them with 1.
i.e. (val & 0xffffffcf) | 0x30 == val | 0x30
> + val |= 0x30;
> + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, 0xd0, val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct amd_tuning_descriptor *td = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
> + u8 ctrl;
> +
> + amd_tuning_reset(host);
> +
> + /*********************************************************************/
> + /* Enabling Software Tuning */
> + /********************************************************************/
> + /* 1. First switch the eMMC to HS200 Mode
> + * 2. Prepare the registers by using the sampling clock select
> + * 3. Send the CMD21 12 times with block length of 64 bytes
> + * 4. Everytime change the clk phase and check for CRC error
> + * (CMD and DATA),if error, soft reset the CMD and DATA line
> + * 5. Calculate the window and set the clock phase.
> + */
> +
> + for (td->tune_around = 0; td->tune_around < 12; td->tune_around++) {
tune_around does not need to be in amd_tuning_descriptor
> + amd_config_tuning_phase(host, td->tune_around);
> +
> + if (mmc_send_tuning(host->mmc, opcode, NULL)) {
> + td->this_tune_ok = false;
> + host->mmc->need_retune = 0;
> + mdelay(4);
Use msleep not mdelay
> + ctrl = SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA;
> + sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET);
> + } else {
> + td->this_tune_ok = true;
this_tune_ok does not need to be in amd_tuning_descriptor
> + }
> +
> + amd_find_good_phase(host);
Pass tune_around and this_tune_ok to amd_find_good_phase
> + }
> +
> + host->mmc->retune_period = 0;
> +
> + amd_enable_manual_tuning(slot);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
> {
> struct pci_dev *smbus_dev;
> @@ -841,7 +1005,6 @@ static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>
> if ((gen == AMD_CHIPSET_BEFORE_ML) || (gen == AMD_CHIPSET_CZ)) {
> chip->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLEAR_TRANSFERMODE_REG_BEFORE_CMD;
> - chip->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_HS200;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -849,6 +1012,7 @@ static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>
Put amd_sdhci_pci_ops here.
> static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_amd = {
> .probe = amd_probe,
> + .ops = &amd_sdhci_pci_ops,
Need to define the private size i.e.
.priv_size = sizeof(struct amd_tuning_descriptor),
> };
>
> static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] = {
> @@ -1469,6 +1633,17 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops = {
> .select_drive_strength = sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength,
> };
>
> +static const struct sdhci_ops amd_sdhci_pci_ops = {
> + .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> + .enable_dma = sdhci_pci_enable_dma,
> + .set_bus_width = sdhci_pci_set_bus_width,
> + .reset = sdhci_reset,
> + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> + .hw_reset = sdhci_pci_hw_reset,
> + .select_drive_strength = sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength,
> + .platform_execute_tuning = amd_execute_tuning,
> +};
Please try to line up the '='
> +
> /*****************************************************************************\
> * *
> * Suspend/resume *
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 6:57 [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD eMMC-4.5.1 Shyam Sundar S K
2016-11-16 12:01 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-10 12:51 [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add support for HS200 tuning mode on AMD, eMMC-4.5.1 Shyam Sundar S K
2016-11-11 12:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-11-14 6:38 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2016-11-14 13:37 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9edba1b9-638d-c8a3-ad3f-43b4635eeb8e@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com \
--cc=Pankaj.Sen@amd.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssundark@amd.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).