From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:49:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1302116833-24540-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:54704 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752636Ab1DHQtT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 12:49:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1302116833-24540-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Per Forlin Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Chris Ball On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Per Forlin wrote: > The intention for introducing none blocking mmc requests is to minimize the > time between a mmc request ends and another mmc request starts. Acked-by: Linus Walleij FWIW, I've looked at the patches so many times I'm already blind for any remaining bugs... Yours, Linus Walleij