From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Per Forlin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:08:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1302116833-24540-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:54624 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753742Ab1DKJIX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:08:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Jae hoon Chung Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Chris Ball On 9 April 2011 13:55, Jae hoon Chung wrote: > Hi Per.. > > I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c. > I think good this approach.. > Do you have any test results from the mmc_tests I added? I am interested in the results. Regards, Per > Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung > > Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > > 2011/4/9 Linus Walleij : >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Per Forlin w= rote: >> >>> The intention for introducing none blocking mmc requests is to mini= mize the >>> time between a mmc request ends and another mmc request starts. >> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij FWIW, I've looked= at the >> patches so many times I'm already blind for any remaining bugs... >> >> Yours, >> Linus Walleij >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc"= in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >