From: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
To: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linaro-dev <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] omap_hsmmc: add support for pre_req and post_req
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:15:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikk14y_tweX45JdDb+qqYtOTuMnbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikP8pveKPPG+_h6_hBenh91vAi4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 16 June 2011 15:14, S, Venkatraman <svenkatr@ti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> wrote:
>> pre_req() runs dma_map_sg(), post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
>> If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request()
>> dma_map_sg will be issued before starting the transfer.
>> It is optional to use pre_req(). If issuing pre_req()
>> post_req() must be to be called as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index ad3731a..2116c09 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@
>> #define OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(base, reg, val) \
>> __raw_writel((val), (base) + OMAP_HSMMC_##reg)
>>
>> +struct omap_hsmmc_next {
>> + unsigned int dma_len;
>> + s32 cookie;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct omap_hsmmc_host {
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct mmc_host *mmc;
>> @@ -184,6 +189,7 @@ struct omap_hsmmc_host {
>> int reqs_blocked;
>> int use_reg;
>> int req_in_progress;
>> + struct omap_hsmmc_next next_data;
>>
>> struct omap_mmc_platform_data *pdata;
>> };
>> @@ -1344,8 +1350,9 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_dma_cb(int lch, u16 ch_status, void *cb_data)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - dma_unmap_sg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), data->sg, data->sg_len,
>> - omap_hsmmc_get_dma_dir(host, data));
>> + if (!data->host_cookie)
>> + dma_unmap_sg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), data->sg, data->sg_len,
>> + omap_hsmmc_get_dma_dir(host, data));
>>
>> req_in_progress = host->req_in_progress;
>> dma_ch = host->dma_ch;
>> @@ -1363,6 +1370,45 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_dma_cb(int lch, u16 ch_status, void *cb_data)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static int omap_hsmmc_pre_dma_transfer(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
>> + struct mmc_data *data,
>> + struct omap_hsmmc_next *next)
>> +{
>
> As you are passing &host->next_data into next, next will always be a
> valid pointer. So..
>
omap_hsmmc_pre_dma_transfer() is called from two places. in pre_req()
and start_dma_transfer().
next is NULL if called from start_dma_transfer.
/Per
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 21:57 [PATCH v4 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] mmci: implement pre_req() and post_req() Per Forlin
[not found] ` <1306360653-6196-1-git-send-email-per.forlin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mmc: add none blocking mmc request function Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] omap_hsmmc: use original sg_len for dma_unmap_sg Per Forlin
2011-06-16 13:16 ` S, Venkatraman
2011-06-17 10:58 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] omap_hsmmc: add support for pre_req and post_req Per Forlin
2011-06-16 13:14 ` S, Venkatraman
2011-06-17 10:15 ` Per Forlin [this message]
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mmc: mmc_test: add debugfs file to list all tests Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mmc: mmc_test: add test for none blocking transfers Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] mmc: add member in mmc queue struct to hold request data Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] mmc: add a block request prepare function Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mmc: move error code in mmc_block_issue_rw_rq to a separate function Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] mmc: add a second mmc queue request member Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mmc: test: add random fault injection in core.c Per Forlin
2011-05-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mmc: add handling for two parallel block requests in issue_rw_rq Per Forlin
2011-06-16 13:39 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency S, Venkatraman
2011-06-17 11:02 ` Per Forlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikk14y_tweX45JdDb+qqYtOTuMnbg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=per.forlin@linaro.org \
--cc=david.vrabel@csr.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).