From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.38.6 MMC controller problem (fwd) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:64573 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753664Ab1EPR4J (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2011 13:56:09 -0400 Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so4129162iwn.19 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 10:56:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Chris Ball , David Strobach , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , horms@verge.net.au, damm@opensource.se, Andrei Warkentin 2011/5/16 Guennadi Liakhovetski : > On Mon, 16 May 2011, Chris Ball wrote: >> My intuition is that we should revert it now -- it's been a week since >> the final -rc, so you'd expect .39 to be released today, and we can >> always add your patch back into stable via .40-rc1 if it's not related >> to the crashes. > > Ok, let's revert it then. Just we have to not forget to work on this > problem and find a proper fix. I'm still baffled by the whole thing, the solution seems so intuitively correct. :-( Is there something strange in the semantics of mmc_claim_host()? Linus Walleij