From: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sdio: report error if pending IRQ but none function bits
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:02:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimhzdAoXSCD0xfGwOMDE9+gbrt53A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1106011029390.30544@xanadu.home>
On 1 June 2011 16:30, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>
>> Return error in case of pending IRQ but none functions bits
>> in CCCR_INTx is set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> index 2f81ddc..8184b6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + if (!pending) {
>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: pending IRQ but none function bits\n",
>> + mmc_card_id(card));
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Nope, this won't work with the polled interrupt mode.
I'll drop this patch.
Thanks for your comment,
Per
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-07 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 20:33 [PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ Per Forlin
2011-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] sdio: add function to enable and disable sdio_single_irq optimization Per Forlin
2011-06-01 7:30 ` Linus Walleij
2011-06-01 7:39 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sdio: report error if pending IRQ but none function bits Per Forlin
2011-06-01 14:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-06-07 7:02 ` Per Forlin [this message]
2011-05-31 21:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ Daniel Drake
2011-06-01 14:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimhzdAoXSCD0xfGwOMDE9+gbrt53A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=per.forlin@linaro.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).