From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: -ENOSYS suspend-powerdown regression Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:54:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:61194 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328Ab1F1Vy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:54:57 -0400 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so424153pzk.19 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:54:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 28 June 2011 22:47, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: >> On 28 June 2011 06:55, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: >>> Obviously the second hunk is necessary, but I'd like to know whether >>> the first one really is too or not. Can you please retest this without >>> that hunk (try to suspend/resume while the chip is powered off, and >>> again while it is powered on, but wol isn't used) ? >> >> Exactly which kernel should I run this test on? > > Latest (isn't that what you've been working with all this time ?). latest linux-mmc.git ? Or linux-next? Or linus? I'll apply the patch in this thread, and my patch titled "mmc: sdio: reset card during power_restore" - anything else? Too many patches floating around, just trying to be sure of what I'm doing! Thanks, Daniel