linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: "Torne (Richard Coles)" <torne@google.com>
Cc: cjb@laptop.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, jh80.chung@samsung.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ben@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: core: cap MMC card timeouts at 2 seconds.
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:00:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrpXc7cODie9g-QK_ZhVpmVZPQ36TDF9CWJcVPL_-EU2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338282140-11106-1-git-send-email-torne@google.com>

Hi Richard,

On 29 May 2012 17:02, Torne (Richard Coles) <torne@google.com> wrote:
> From: "Torne (Richard Coles)" <torne@google.com>
>
> MMC CSD info can specify very large, ridiculous timeouts, big enough to
> overflow timeout_ns on 32-bit machines. This can result in the card
> timing out on every operation because the wrapped timeout value is far
> too small.
>
> Fix the overflow by capping the result at 2 seconds.  Cards specifying
> longer timeouts are almost certainly insane, and host controllers
> generally cannot support timeouts that long in any case.
>
> 2 seconds should be plenty of time for any card to actually function;
> the timeout calculation code is already using 1 second as a "worst case"
> timeout for cards running in SPI mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Torne (Richard Coles) <torne@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 0b6141d..3b4a9fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -512,7 +512,16 @@ void mmc_set_data_timeout(struct mmc_data *data, const struct mmc_card *card)
>        if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE)
>                mult <<= card->csd.r2w_factor;
>
> -       data->timeout_ns = card->csd.tacc_ns * mult;
> +       /*
> +        * The timeout in nanoseconds may overflow with some cards. Cap it at
> +        * two seconds both to avoid the overflow and also because host
> +        * controllers cannot generally generate timeouts that long anyway.
> +        */
> +       if (card->csd.tacc_ns <= (2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) / mult)
> +               data->timeout_ns = card->csd.tacc_ns * mult;
> +       else
> +               data->timeout_ns = 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> +

The above looks OK to me, although if doing this for tacc_ns we might
want to do this for tacc_clks as well. Could we include that is this
patch as well?

>        data->timeout_clks = card->csd.tacc_clks * mult;
>
>        /*
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-31 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-28 17:31 [PATCH V2] MMC: core: cap MMC card timeouts at 2 seconds Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-05-29  2:32 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-05-29  9:02   ` Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-05-29  9:02     ` [PATCH] " Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-05-31 10:00       ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2012-05-31 10:15         ` Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-05-31 15:00           ` Ulf Hansson
2012-06-01  8:35   ` [PATCH V2] " Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01  9:31     ` Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-06-01  9:32       ` Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-06-01 10:09         ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 10:20           ` Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-06-01 12:59             ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 13:12               ` Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-06-01 13:20                 ` [PATCH V3] MMC: core: cap MMC card timeouts at UINT_MAX Torne (Richard Coles)
2012-06-04  8:13                   ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 14:48               ` [PATCH V2] MMC: core: cap MMC card timeouts at 2 seconds Chris Ball
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-14 15:51 [PATCH] " Torne (Richard Coles)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPDyKFrpXc7cODie9g-QK_ZhVpmVZPQ36TDF9CWJcVPL_-EU2Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torne@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).