From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] MMC/SDHCI fixes
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:23:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrxJBAiic44VRWRW-53vz6GqosH+6_qbFSgQnJ5aew=BQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151221125120.GZ8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 21 December 2015 at 13:51, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:36PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> I decided to try to apply it for my next branch, to get some good test
>> coverage. Although, it failed when reaching patch 8. Would you mind
>> posting yet another new re-based version, please.
>
> Given that these are _fixes_ and need to be applied to -rc kernels, they
> are based on -rc6. I don't see the point of rebasing them onto non-rc
> kernels to test, because then you're not testing against where they
> should be applied.
I see your point, but I would rather not aim for rcs with these
changes, unless you insist.
Not because they aren't fixes, but because it's old errors. Instead we
can "cc stable" or use the fixes tag as we are in quite late stage of
the rc. This approach will also allow us to get a bit better test
coverage.
What do you think?
Kind regards
Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-21 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 11:39 [PATCH v2 00/24] MMC/SDHCI fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] mmc: core: shut up "voltage-ranges unspecified" pr_info() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] mmc: core: improve mmc_of_parse_voltage() to return better status Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mmc: block: shut up "retrying because a re-tune was needed" message Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mmc: core: report tuning command execution failure reason Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] mmc: sdhci: move initialisation of command error member Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mmc: sdhci: clean up command error handling Russell King
2015-12-21 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mmc: sdhci: command response CRC " Russell King
2015-12-29 13:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-02 12:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 11:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-26 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mmc: sdhci: avoid unnecessary mapping/unmapping of align buffer Russell King
2015-12-29 13:44 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-02 12:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-02 14:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 11:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-04 11:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-04 11:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mmc: sdhci: clean up coding style in sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] mmc: sdhci: avoid walking SG list for writes Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] mmc: sdhci: factor out common DMA cleanup in sdhci_finish_data() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] mmc: sdhci: move sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] mmc: sdhci: factor out sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() from sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] mmc: sdhci: pass the cookie into sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mmc: sdhci: always unmap a mapped data transfer in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] mmc: sdhci: clean up host cookie handling Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] mmc: sdhci: plug DMA mapping leak on error Russell King
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: fix higher speed mode capabilities Russell King
2015-12-21 11:54 ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-12-21 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mmc: sdhci: further fix for DMA unmapping in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 1) Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 2) Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] mmc: sdhci: prepare DMA address/size quirk handling consolidation Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mmc: sdhci: consolidate the DMA/ADMA size/address quicks Russell King
2015-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] mmc: sdhci: further code simplication Russell King
2015-12-21 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] MMC/SDHCI fixes Ulf Hansson
2015-12-21 12:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 13:23 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2015-12-21 13:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 13:59 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-22 11:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-22 11:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-21 12:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPDyKFrxJBAiic44VRWRW-53vz6GqosH+6_qbFSgQnJ5aew=BQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).