From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 15/17] mmc: sdhci: clean up host cookie handling
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:31:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1aAO9w-0007zX-Py@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151219202851.GS8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Commit d31911b9374a ("mmc: sdhci: fix dma memory leak in sdhci_pre_req()")
added a complicated method to manage the DMA map state for the data
transfer, but this complexity is not required.
There are three states:
* Unmapped
* Mapped by sdhci_pre_req()
* Mapped by sdhci_prepare_data()
sdhci_prepare_data() needs to know when the data buffers have been
successfully mapped by sdhci_pre_req(), and if so, there is no need to
map them a second time.
When we come to tear down the mapping, we want to know whether
sdhci_post_req() will be called (which is determined by sdhci_pre_req()
having been previously called) so that we can postpone the unmap
operation.
Hence, it makes sense to simply record when the successful DMA map
happened (via COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED vs COOKIE_MAPPED) rather than having
the complex mechanics involving COOKIE_MAPPED vs COOKIE_GIVEN.
If a mapping is created by sdhci_prepare_data(), we must tear it down
ourselves, without waiting for sdhci_post_req() (hence, the new
COOKIE_MAPPED case). If the mapping is created by sdhci_pre_req()
then sdhci_post_req() is responsible for tearing the mapping down.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 264248ac439e..6f23dba74cbc 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -431,12 +431,12 @@ static int sdhci_pre_dma_transfer(struct sdhci_host *host,
{
int sg_count;
- if (data->host_cookie == COOKIE_MAPPED) {
- data->host_cookie = COOKIE_GIVEN;
+ /*
+ * If the data buffers are already mapped, return the previous
+ * dma_map_sg() result.
+ */
+ if (data->host_cookie == COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED)
return data->sg_count;
- }
-
- WARN_ON(data->host_cookie == COOKIE_GIVEN);
sg_count = dma_map_sg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), data->sg, data->sg_len,
data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE ?
@@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ static void sdhci_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq,
mrq->data->host_cookie = COOKIE_UNMAPPED;
if (host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA)
- sdhci_pre_dma_transfer(host, mrq->data, COOKIE_MAPPED);
+ sdhci_pre_dma_transfer(host, mrq->data, COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED);
}
static void sdhci_card_event(struct mmc_host *mmc)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
index 9d4aa31b683a..9dd2e1f688ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
@@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ struct sdhci_adma2_64_desc {
enum sdhci_cookie {
COOKIE_UNMAPPED,
- COOKIE_MAPPED,
- COOKIE_GIVEN,
+ COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED, /* mapped by sdhci_pre_req() */
+ COOKIE_MAPPED, /* mapped by sdhci_prepare_data() */
};
struct sdhci_host {
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-19 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-19 20:28 [PATCH 00/17] MMC/SDHCI fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-19 20:29 ` [PATCH 01/17] mmc: core: shut up "voltage-ranges unspecified" pr_info() Russell King
2015-12-21 10:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-21 10:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-19 20:30 ` Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 02/17] mmc: block: shut up "retrying because a re-tune was needed" message Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 03/17] mmc: core: report tuning command execution failure reason Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 04/17] mmc: sdhci: move initialisation of command error member Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 05/17] mmc: sdhci: clean up command error handling Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 06/17] mmc: sdhci: command response CRC " Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 07/17] mmc: sdhci: avoid unnecessary mapping/unmapping of align buffer Russell King
2015-12-21 10:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-12-21 10:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 08/17] mmc: sdhci: clean up coding style in sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 09/17] mmc: sdhci: avoid walking SG list for writes Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 10/17] mmc: sdhci: factor out common DMA cleanup in sdhci_finish_data() Russell King
2015-12-19 20:30 ` [PATCH 11/17] mmc: sdhci: move sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2015-12-19 20:31 ` [PATCH 12/17] mmc: sdhci: factor out sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() from sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2015-12-19 20:31 ` [PATCH 13/17] mmc: sdhci: pass the cookie into sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2015-12-19 20:31 ` [PATCH 14/17] mmc: sdhci: always unmap a mapped data transfer in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2015-12-19 20:31 ` Russell King [this message]
2015-12-19 20:31 ` [PATCH 16/17] mmc: sdhci: plug DMA mapping leak on error Russell King
2015-12-19 20:31 ` [PATCH 17/17] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: fix higher speed mode capabilities Russell King
2015-12-19 21:42 ` [PATCH 18/17] mmc: sdhci: further fix for DMA unmapping in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2015-12-20 8:27 ` [PATCH 19/17] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 1) Russell King
2015-12-20 8:27 ` [PATCH 20/17] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 2) Russell King
2015-12-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 00/17] MMC/SDHCI fixes Ulf Hansson
2015-12-21 11:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1aAO9w-0007zX-Py@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).