From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/25] mmc: core: shut up "voltage-ranges unspecified" pr_info()
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:43:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1aP5ao-0001oW-4u@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160129094324.GA20025@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Each time a driver such as sdhci-esdhc-imx is probed, we get a info
printk complaining that the DT voltage-ranges property has not been
specified.
However, the DT binding specifically says that the voltage-ranges
property is optional. That means we should not be complaining that
DT hasn't specified this property: by indicating that it's optional,
it is valid not to have the property in DT.
Silence the warning if the property is missing.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index f95d41ffc766..8e25dcb42bfe 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1214,8 +1214,12 @@ int mmc_of_parse_voltage(struct device_node *np, u32 *mask)
voltage_ranges = of_get_property(np, "voltage-ranges", &num_ranges);
num_ranges = num_ranges / sizeof(*voltage_ranges) / 2;
- if (!voltage_ranges || !num_ranges) {
- pr_info("%s: voltage-ranges unspecified\n", np->full_name);
+ if (!voltage_ranges) {
+ pr_debug("%s: voltage-ranges unspecified\n", np->full_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (!num_ranges) {
+ pr_err("%s: voltage-ranges empty\n", np->full_name);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-29 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 9:43 [PATCH v4 00/25] MMC/SDHCI fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-29 9:43 ` Russell King [this message]
2016-01-29 9:43 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] mmc: core: improve mmc_of_parse_voltage() to return better status Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] mmc: block: shut up "retrying because a re-tune was needed" message Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] mmc: core: report tuning command execution failure reason Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] mmc: sdhci: move initialisation of command error member Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] mmc: sdhci: clean up command error handling Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] mmc: sdhci: command response CRC " Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] mmc: sdhci: avoid unnecessary mapping/unmapping of align buffer Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] mmc: sdhci: allocate alignment and DMA descriptor buffer together Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] mmc: sdhci: clean up coding style in sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] mmc: sdhci: avoid walking SG list for writes Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 12/25] mmc: sdhci: factor out common DMA cleanup in sdhci_finish_data() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] mmc: sdhci: move sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] mmc: sdhci: factor out sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() from sdhci_adma_table_pre() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] mmc: sdhci: pass the cookie into sdhci_pre_dma_transfer() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] mmc: sdhci: always unmap a mapped data transfer in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] mmc: sdhci: clean up host cookie handling Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] mmc: sdhci: plug DMA mapping leak on error Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: fix higher speed mode capabilities Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] mmc: sdhci: further fix for DMA unmapping in sdhci_post_req() Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 1) Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 2) Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] mmc: sdhci: prepare DMA address/size quirk handling consolidation Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] mmc: sdhci: consolidate the DMA/ADMA size/address quicks Russell King
2016-01-29 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] mmc: sdhci: further code simplication Russell King
2016-02-04 10:55 ` [PATCH v4 00/25] MMC/SDHCI fixes Ulf Hansson
2016-02-12 9:49 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-02-12 14:23 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-02-16 13:08 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1aP5ao-0001oW-4u@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox