From: "Joe Woodward" <jw@terrafix.co.uk>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: mmc: sdio: runtime PM and 8686 problems
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:29:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <WC20111201112905.8702EB@terrafix.co.uk> (raw)
I've had a play with the nRESET line (as far as I can tell it is the only pin I have access to), and no joy.
Also tried playing about a bit with the CMD sequence, again no joy.
I'm not entirely sure of the CMD sequence. It seems we get:
- CMD52 (x2)
- CMD0
- CMD8 (fails)
- CMD5 (fails)
In the "SDIO Simplified Specification Version 2.00" (https://www.sdcard.org/developers/overview/sdio/sdio_spec/Simplified_SDIO_Card_Spec.pdf) page 6 it seems only a CMD52 should be required to "Re-init IO". Previous thread posts state CMD5 (x2) are required by the 8686, but why CMD0/CMD8?
Incidentally errors only occur after the CMD0, but before the first error we get (i.e. a change of cs from 1 to 0):
"mmc1: clock 400000Hz busmode 2 powermode 2 cs 0 Vdd 20 width 0 timing 0".
Any thoughts?
I think we've probably hit the end of the line here, unless someone else pops up who knows more about the Gumstix (i.e. has access to a schematic) or the W2CBW003 and it's SD8686 internals.
Thanks for the help anyway chaps!
Cheers,
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
To: Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:07:24 +0200
Subject: Re: mmc: sdio: runtime PM and 8686 problems
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > It seems CMD5 fails (which seems to be what the workarounds were
> aiming to fix).
>
> Right; you get a timeout (-110), which means the 8686 didn't send any
> response.
>
> This is unexpected because the sdio reset (the CMD52 you see before
> the init sequence) should be enough to reset the device (we confirmed
> this with the Marvell folks on this list awhile ago).
>
> > I'm afraid I may not be of much more use as Gumstix (annoyingly)
> don't release schematics of their COMs, so actually probing any signals
> isn't really possible.
>
> Yes, it makes it difficult to debug.
>
> You can try to verify (in the code) that all the text book
> prerequisites are there (e.g. all SDIO lines are pulled up and muxed
> correctly. though since stuff work for you without SDIO runtime PM, I
> assume these are ok), and maybe even play a bit with stuff like
> delays, sdio resets and power cycles and see if things change. If you
> have access to the other inputs of the 8686 (it has several of them
> which are related to power and resets. Neither me nor Daniel have
> intimate knowledge about what any of those really do, but you could
> dig some info from emails send by Marvell folks on this list), then
> you can also try to play with them and see if things change. With
> luck, you could learn more about the problem and can hopefully get
> closer to finding a solution.
>
> It could be great if a solution will be found, but if not, we'll
> probably have to proceed with the revert...
>
> Good luck!
> Ohad.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 11:29 Joe Woodward [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-01 11:29 mmc: sdio: runtime PM and 8686 problems Joe Woodward
2011-11-18 8:53 Joe Woodward
2011-11-18 9:06 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-18 10:00 ` Joe Woodward
2011-11-18 12:15 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 11:17 ` Joe Woodward
2011-11-29 12:43 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-29 21:42 ` Daniel Drake
2011-11-30 10:36 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 14:12 ` Daniel Drake
2011-11-30 14:29 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 14:57 ` Daniel Drake
2011-12-01 7:50 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-11-30 15:00 ` Joe Woodward
2011-12-01 8:07 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-12-01 11:28 ` Joe Woodward
2011-12-03 16:44 ` Daniel Drake
2011-12-03 16:45 ` Daniel Drake
2011-12-07 12:28 ` Joe Woodward
2011-12-19 9:10 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-12-19 9:22 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-04-26 23:51 ` Steve Sakoman
2012-04-27 8:26 ` Joe Woodward
2012-04-28 9:51 ` NeilBrown
2011-11-11 7:26 [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device Seungwon Jeon
2011-11-11 9:38 ` S, Venkatraman
2011-11-11 19:01 ` merez
2011-11-14 9:46 ` Seungwon Jeon
2011-11-15 12:48 ` merez
2011-11-17 2:02 ` Seungwon Jeon
2011-11-17 9:16 ` mmc: sdio: runtime PM and 8686 problems Joe Woodward
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=WC20111201112905.8702EB@terrafix.co.uk \
--to=jw@terrafix.co.uk \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox