From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75A0C433F5 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 04:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229458AbiDEEti (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 00:49:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58016 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229646AbiDEEtL (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 00:49:11 -0400 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (www.zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29AACBC36 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Cbu5imkSxmYw8BD7MxQU3rR2N6h6 Y4uRLJS6hFCxJB0=; b=uroHnEP3KHV/eYhuNvbJOVEou/nJHePNgdHzii+CfUnW DrOF4BRUlcjVXePd9soij7tZg5gwyUoyiFcVicC4pcmU4uLK7CTT4VtezkmHUB/c /grlmS+lCSMPyZ1Z/K4xpVkHdRYvRCmlTGqGck35EsxI2Vv1yLMWyUJajG0+raY= Received: (qmail 2125024 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2022 06:45:22 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 5 Apr 2022 06:45:22 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@Diph6eDbFNwgAQnoAHlrAKkk7l/QScWc Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:45:18 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Lad, Prabhakar" Cc: Lad Prabhakar , Ulf Hansson , Philipp Zabel , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Linux MMC List , Pavel Machek , LKML , Linux-Renesas , Biju Das Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: renesas_internal_dmac: Fix typo's Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , "Lad, Prabhakar" , Lad Prabhakar , Ulf Hansson , Philipp Zabel , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Linux MMC List , Pavel Machek , LKML , Linux-Renesas , Biju Das References: <20220404172322.32578-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20220404172322.32578-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XGw+3cSwhZWV2vXx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org --XGw+3cSwhZWV2vXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > > > - /* This DMAC cannot handle if buffer is not 128-bytes alignment */ > > > + /* This DMAC cannot handle if buffer is not 128-bytes aligned */ > > > > Well, as we are here now, I think this can be further improved. > > > "The internal DMAC supports 128-bytes aligned buffers only", does this > sound good? I'd think it should be "128 byte aligned"? But I can't explain why, just a gut feeling. Otherwise good! --XGw+3cSwhZWV2vXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmJLyVoACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbStw/9FM9rKMQ30IKzCdiUkW37SCGDxC3zsb4B8ekiSgarbLM4gTKacYLVB0SE N8CAHx/Zc33WxgmVXx0UOWmrzN24zEBq1NtH20I0+Bvspl94UZ7XbLq3eJ53fbx+ 1d5vnZFyo0Je5lFGlUy9aKAsMfKG+Jk1lI6uAFsJR8t/D7e0s1b3i9ZUB4U5bFAl fHAXT/ZvTl3cnX9vLcoeH+DWZjBYqU42JI4qqof5aVdN+pbDialUOuZvqUyvKHUM t9FHV/mKnnGsMOycEX6Cb4hGEB9xNOJjuxXu3gw93WZHH52UQAKG80OFbtdggT/e 78rIpPlzwDNmYd5QXc1aGECHRfH2jCu5pDitk/8uRjSxs3gKyHe6noaQ4DnYNi8c JKG9X6KsQlf+5M3OBgOdRM2Q9sMTv00l07av9dxfTiS52fPEBxIbRlhnoJ7XKEn8 4NgcNN32sQ5hu2pKQyKpT+o1LQ94K/1m3UHSl26/ggtrWvr3P+ybCKG6lUpElsnm q6QV1lBjY+8Iq4Dgx9OSh4a5ZxfTaSjeq/SrDgzkTRiD2nyEs7NCnNrcdZwIbYWA q0rSBHDedP0Oqe6JpgcJfOJxTPYPF9T1PItSpp8fYIgVBFmOnzScmp7nRG/E7aPg DOSmkYW1svjwtJsWXLvfV7gFs+q847A3STZexo+A8BHc0JJVTVE= =lfpM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XGw+3cSwhZWV2vXx--